<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Cone and the Trade that Sunk the &#8217;92 Brewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/08/10/david-cone-and-the-trade-that-sunk-the-92-brewers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/08/10/david-cone-and-the-trade-that-sunk-the-92-brewers/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:53:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/08/10/david-cone-and-the-trade-that-sunk-the-92-brewers/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1336#comment-1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saying that &quot;any other team in the American League could have claimed Cone on waivers in order to block the trade&quot; is misleading.  According to this piece from the LA Times, Cone was placed on waivers at the beginning of August, and no one -- not the Brewers, not the O&#039;s, not the Jays -- claimed him. That left the Mets free to deal Cone to whichever team they wanted; it&#039;s not like the Brewers or O&#039;s could&#039;ve tried to retroactively claim Cone on August 27 to block the trade.

http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-28/sports/sp-5988_1_blue-jays]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that &#8220;any other team in the American League could have claimed Cone on waivers in order to block the trade&#8221; is misleading.  According to this piece from the LA Times, Cone was placed on waivers at the beginning of August, and no one &#8212; not the Brewers, not the O&#8217;s, not the Jays &#8212; claimed him. That left the Mets free to deal Cone to whichever team they wanted; it&#8217;s not like the Brewers or O&#8217;s could&#8217;ve tried to retroactively claim Cone on August 27 to block the trade.</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-28/sports/sp-5988_1_blue-jays" rel="nofollow">http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-28/sports/sp-5988_1_blue-jays</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/08/10/david-cone-and-the-trade-that-sunk-the-92-brewers/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1336#comment-1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 92 Brewers played some of their best baseball of the year post-Cone trade, finishing the season on a 24-10 run after August 27th, with the pitching staff putting up a 2.71 ERA in Sept/October. There may have been some value in keeping him off the Jays, but the Brewers played really, really well after the trade that wasn&#039;t made. 

The 1992 outfield of Yount, Bichette, Vaughn and Hamilton, with Molitor as the DH was the strong part of the offense and makes trading for Canseco or Bass a minimal upgrade in a month sample.  Bill Krueger was at the end of his career and largely inneffective in 1992. 

Of course every team that is close but doesn&#039;t make it can look at the moves not made, but I&#039;m not seeing a whole lot to back up the article&#039;s premise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 92 Brewers played some of their best baseball of the year post-Cone trade, finishing the season on a 24-10 run after August 27th, with the pitching staff putting up a 2.71 ERA in Sept/October. There may have been some value in keeping him off the Jays, but the Brewers played really, really well after the trade that wasn&#8217;t made. </p>
<p>The 1992 outfield of Yount, Bichette, Vaughn and Hamilton, with Molitor as the DH was the strong part of the offense and makes trading for Canseco or Bass a minimal upgrade in a month sample.  Bill Krueger was at the end of his career and largely inneffective in 1992. </p>
<p>Of course every team that is close but doesn&#8217;t make it can look at the moves not made, but I&#8217;m not seeing a whole lot to back up the article&#8217;s premise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
