The Brewers would certainly not be an exception. Projecting baseball players for a season is really hard, much less for a career. But with the benefit of hindsight, if the Brewers were all in for winning in 2017, what would their optimal roster look like?

To be clear, this isn’t a criticism of any moves the Brewers have or have not made. Some things are just impossible to know ahead of time, and even if you could perfectly project a player’s performance over his controllable years, you’d still have to weigh that against the opportunity cost of acquiring other players, or their playing time.

To start, let’s set some ground rules. First, the players selected for our optimal 25-man roster in 2017 must have the ability to theoretically be under team control this year. In other words, they have less than six years of service time and would fall under their original Brewers contract, or are currently under contract with the team. So Ryan Braun is eligible, even though he has 9 years of service time.

Second, players who were traded for each other can’t both appear on the list, but either one can. For example, we can imagine a scenario where the Brewers did not trade Lucroy, so he makes the cut, but Lewis Brinson wouldn’t since the Brewers wouldn’t have acquired him without trading Lucroy.

This gets really tricky in multi-player deals, such as the Houston trade that brought Domingo Santana and Brett Phillips to the Brewers in exchange for Fiers and Gomez. Ultimately, our goal here is to maximize PECOTA’s projected 2017 WARP. After weighing position scarcity to fill out the 25-man in a reasonable way and considering that Gomez would have hit free agency by now and therefore isn’t eligible for the list, Fiers is on the roster but Domingo, sadly, is not.

Taking all this into account, here is a list of players that could fill out a 25-man roster that have been on the Brewers’ 40 man sorted by PECOTA’s 2017 projected WARP:

I cheated a little bit by including Jorge Lopez as a reliever here, but let’s just call it the “Adam Wainwright plan” for right now, because relievers under team control with projected WARP are scarce. You could quibble with that roster decision, and actually wouldn’t lose too much in terms of total WARP as there are a few other relievers with 0.1 projected WARP for 2017.

All things considered, this is a pretty fun roster! An outfield with Braun, Khris Davis, and Lorenzo Cain is intriguing. The infield rests pretty heavily on Jean Segura’s projection, but even if you want to lean on the conservative side for him this year, that bench might be the best in baseball. There’s room for upside, too, if you think more highly of Keon Broxton or want to add Eric Thames, who maybe has more potential than PECOTA currently projects him for.

Of course adding up the projected WARP isn’t an exact science, as PECOTA is projecting a full season of plate appearances out of Villar, who has a utility/bench role on our roster. Keon Broxton, also on our bench, is projected for 352 plate appearances. We may want to downgrade our projected total WARP by a win or two to account for those differences.

Even with those adjustments, this projects as an above-average team. You might consider this roster a fringe wild-card team, similar to the Pirates (80 projected wins by PECOTA) or the Yankees (82 projected wins). That’s something, but not a whole lot more optimistic than PECOTA’s projected 76 wins for the Crew this season.

It’s also impossible to account for variables in performance or along organizational decision-making. You can’t say that each player would have performed the exact same in Milwaukee as they have after moving on to other parks, or that the Brewers wouldn’t have used some of that bench depth to trade for an elite reliever or two. Or that Broxton and Villar would even have that much value, given we’re projecting them as bench and utility guys in this scenario. The possibilities are endless.

But it’d be a fun team for sure, and you could see it being competitive. However, the costs would be great, too.

It probably would mean no division title and playoff run in 2011, as Zack Greinke wouldn’t have been in the picture. Even if your preference is for a steadier and consistent 75-85 win projection every year rather than swings between 96 and 68 wins over the past few years, I’m still not sure the “optimal” 25 man is actually that from the fan’s perspective—especially given the NL Central division over the next several years.

Realistically it seems like the Cubs aren’t going anywhere atop the division, and the Pirates have had a measure of success largely by acquiring young, controllable talent and not overspending on free agency. The PECOTA projection is down on the Cardinals this year, but they seem to have a way of just making life difficult for the Brewers.

Even with the benefit of hindsight, give me the current roster with its upside to dream on and wide error margins. It’ll be that kind of gamble that the Brewers will have to take to be competitive in the division, and comes without having to forfeit the success of the 2011 team.

The Brewers front office knows what it’s doing, and has earned itself another piece of key lime pie at dessert.

PECOTA is projecting a third place tie this year in the NL Central for our local nine, pegging them to win 76 games along with the St. Louis Cardinals. That would be an improvement over last year’s total of 73 wins and hopefully portend to the fact that this is truly a team on the rise, one that could be legitimately competing for at least a Wild Card in the not-too-distant future. But for as bright as the future of the Brew Crew may look, getting to the playoffs will ultimately depend on how well their team stacks up against the rest of the organizations in the division. So, let’s take this opportunity to run around the NL Central and see how each team’s future stacks up by comparing top ten prospects and 2017 PECOTA projections.

Chicago Cubs
2016: 103-58
2017 PECOTA: 91-71

It’s hard to argue against the fact that the defending World Series Champion Cubs are the juggernaut of the division. They were the best team in baseball last year and have the second-highest projected win total in the National League for 2017 according to PECOTA. The Cubs have a core of young stars in place at the MLB level, lead by Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, and Addison Russell, that should anchor their lineup for through at least the end of the decade. Since they’ve graduated a myriad of first-division players in recent years and spent prospect capital to supplement last year’s championship team, the farm system is now more ‘good’ than it is ‘great’. With the current group in place in The Show, however, the Cubs farm system needn’t necessarily produce stars in the next few years to be helpful to the franchise, as long as they can utilize those pieces in trade scenarios and be able to produce decent depth in an injury scenario. Having the ability to put together $180+ million payrolls won’t hurt, either. The Cubs are going to be around for a long time, and serve as the most daunting impediment to the future dynasty that Slingin’ David Stearns is trying to build.

Trending: -

Pittsburgh Pirates
2016: 78-83
2017 PECOTA: 81-81

The Pirates regressed big time last year after consecutive seasons of 94, 88, and 98 victories, riding a slightly above-average offense and slightly below-average pitching staff to a mere 78 wins and a third place finish in the division. Injuries didn’t help, and neither did the sudden implosion of former MVP Andrew McCutchen. The Pirates neglected to bring in any real help this winter and will instead hope for a bounceback from Cutch as he heads to right field and for positive contributions from top prospects on the cusp Josh Bell, Tyler Glasnow, and Austin Meadows. The farm system isn’t all that exciting beyond those three (with the exception of maybe Mitch Keller), but Glasnow and Meadows are considered truly elite prospects and the collective “likely” grades of their top 10 should at least give the system a solid floor. While an 81 win projection may put them within spitting distance of the Wild Card race, Pittsburgh has already seen how heartbreaking that road can be. The Pirates may have missed their best window to truly compete for a championship.

Trending: \/

St. Louis Cardinals
2016: 86-76
2017 PECOTA: 76-86

The Cardinals had another winning season last year, though they narrowly missed qualifying for the playoffs as a Wild Card by one game. That’s not to say the year was without some tumult, however. Kolten Wong (who signed a five-year extension prior to the season) and Randal Grichuk, once thought of as long-term anchors in the lineup, both struggled so mightily that they were banished to the minors for a time and now face questions about their long-term viability. The pitching staff was a mess, with large regressions in run prevention from Adam Wainwright, Mike Leake, Jaime Garcia, Michael Wacha, and Trevor Rosenthal. Guys like Wainwright, Yadier Molina, Jhonny Peralta, and Matt Carpenter aren’t getting any younger. Alex Reyes is perhaps the best pitching prospect in the game and looks like he’ll be a real contributor as soon as next season, but beyond that there doesn’t appear to be much impact depth coming in the near future to replace the aging All-Stars currently on the roster. Unless the Cardinals can conjure up some Devil Magic and have a few of their prospects outperform projections, St. Louis might be heading toward some lean years (relatively speaking, of course).

Trending: \/

Cincinnati Reds
2016: 68-94
2017 PECOTA: 74-88

The Reds, in my mind, are an example of how NOT to run a rebuild for your ballclub. The team’s trades of their two most valuable assets – Aroldis Chapman and Todd Frazier – were both widely panned. The Jay Bruce trade yielded an MLB ready, potentially league-average middle infielder in Dilson Herrera, who has nowhere to play because Zack Cosart, Brandon Phillips, and Eugenio Suarez are all still in the fold. There doesn’t appear to be any future stars down in the farm system, and even though the Reds have a decent collection of prospects it is still arguably the worst minor league system in the division (though January’s trade of Dan Straily to the Marlins did return a high-octane, 60 OFP/50 likely arm in Luis Castillo who helps things a smidge). Joey Votto is still here and still awesome (even though a large contingent of Reds’ fans refuse to admit it) but this team is projected for last place in the division and with a farm system that is the poorest among their NL Central foes. Can you rebuild a rebuild?

Trending: \/

Milwaukee Brewers
2016: 73-89
2017 PECOTA: 76-86

The Brewers improved from 68 wins in 2015 to 73 wins in 2016, all while continuing to ship out veteran players in exchange for impact prospects. PECOTA sees continued improvement to 76 wins next season, and with only modest contributions from the top prospects down in the minor leagues (156 PA for Lewis Brinson, 26.0 IP for Josh Hader). Milwaukee looks like they’ve found keepers where they may not have necessarily been looking in Jonathan Villar and Zach Davies, and Junior Guerra, Domingo Santana, and Keon Broxton could add themselves to that list this season if they can prove their smaller sample sizes last year were no fluke. Milwaukee has a truly elite prospect in Brinson and another one near that level in Hader, and their system boasts the most 60+ OFP prospects in the division. Eight of Milwaukee’s top 10 prospects are expected to arrive within the next two years, so if one of the current MLB players flames out, there should be a hungry minor leaguer right there to take their place. The Brewers rebuild has been almost universally praised, and it should be. While the system may not have the top end pieces like Pittsburgh, there is almost an extreme amount of depth and when you have THAT many legitimate prospects, the chances are a much better that a few of them will hit their 90th percentile outcomes. The Brewers may not be ready for a playoff run in 2017, but they’ve probably got the best chance of the divisional teams to unseat the Cubs from their throne come 2018-19.

Trending: /\