<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Milwaukee &#187; Mauricio Dubon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/tag/mauricio-dubon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Murky Up the Middle: Weighing Middle Infield Options</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/13/murky-up-the-middle-weighing-middle-infield-options/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/13/murky-up-the-middle-weighing-middle-infield-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Nofz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hernan Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Schoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keston Hiura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Arcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Saladino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After coming within one win of the World Series, expectations in Milwaukee will no doubt be high for the 2019 Brewers. But the franchise enters the offseason in a peculiar place: they “arrived” slightly ahead of schedule, and will now defend their NL Central championship with a roster that, on paper, still looks a piece [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After coming within one win of the World Series, expectations in Milwaukee will no doubt be high for the 2019 Brewers. But the franchise enters the offseason in a peculiar place: they “arrived” slightly ahead of schedule, and will now defend their NL Central championship with a roster that, on paper, still looks a piece of two shy of perennial contender status. Because of this, the 2019 season looks like one that will provide fans an intriguing blend of established names (Christian Yelich, Lorenzo Cain, Travis Shaw, Ryan Braun) and continuing player development at the big league level (Jesus Aguilar, Orlando Arcia, Freddy Peralta, and Corbin Burnes, among many others).</p>
<p>Depending on which moves David Stearns and company make this offseason, and how and where Travis Shaw fits into the equation, the middle of the infield figures to be an area of special interest. Young and intriguing players abound, with still more waiting in the wings. Highlighted below are a few of the players most likely to impact up the middle next season.</p>
<h2>Major Leagues</h2>
<h3>Orlando Arcia, SS</h3>
<p>Arcia arrived in 2016 shouldering high expectations. He was Milwaukee’s best prospect since Ryan Braun came along in 2007 and changed the history of the franchise. Arcia produced a very nice age-22 season in 2017, finishing with 3.4 Wins Above Replacement Player (WARP) and vaulting <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/article/34948/2018-prospects-milwaukee-brewers-top-10-prospects-lewis-brinson-monte-harrison-keston-hiura-rankings/">to the top</a> of Milwaukee’s list of talents aged 25 and under, just ahead of Domingo Santana. Times have changed.</p>
<p>Arcia regressed to a .214 True Average (TAv) and 0.0 WARP in 2018, losing playing time to a handful of low-profile players and heading into the All-Star Break below the Mendoza line. After some time sorting out his swing in the minors, he roared back to life in the second half, clawing playing time back from the just-imported Jonathan Schoop and helping to lead the team through their playoff charge.</p>
<p>Arcia is still just 24 years old, is a ton of fun to watch on the infield, and has offered fans glimpses of his offensive potential over the last two years. He’ll be starting at shortstop next spring, perhaps with a somewhat shorter leash than he had at the start of 2018.</p>
<h3>Travis Shaw, 2B</h3>
<p>Shaw famously crossed over to the right side of the infield at the trade deadline, freeing up the hot corner for Mike Moustakas. He’s 6’4” and 230 pounds, but showed solid glove work and good instincts at the keystone, especially for someone learning on the fly. As lines between positions <a href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/baseball-positions-are-starting-to-lose-their-meaning/">blur around the league</a>, the big man could see more time at second base in 2019.</p>
<p>Shaw recorded 32 home runs in just under 500 at bats in 2018, marking his second year in a row reaching that milestone. He showed a nice approach at the plate, drawing 78 walks to offset his 108 strikeouts. He also topped the 4-WARP plateau for the second straight season, making him the kind of cheap, under-the-radar star that franchises like Milwaukee need in order to sustain success.</p>
<p>There may be more in the tank. Shaw is still in the midst of his physical prime, and recorded an average exit velocity in 2018 that was right in line with his career norms. Even so, his BABIP dipped 70 points from 2017. Some of this can be attributed to an uptick in fly balls. But if Shaw can add back a few points to his batting average, and perhaps decrease his reliance on pulling the ball in certain counts, 2019 could be the year that he breaks out as one of the better-rounded sluggers in the league.</p>
<h3>Jonathan Schoop, 2B/SS</h3>
<p>Schoop enjoyed a monster 2017 in Baltimore, accumulating 4.7 WARP and whacking 32 home runs while providing surprisingly good defense at second base. 2018 didn’t go as well, particularly after the trade that sent him to Milwaukee in exchange for Jonathan Villar (still hurts), Luis Ortiz, and Jean Carmona. That’s a bit of a haul, but Schoop was hot, and he’s been a special bat in the past. Milwaukee didn’t get that player; Schoop struggled to a .202/.246/.331 line in 46 games for the Brewers.</p>
<p>Schoop is controllable for 2019, though it’s less clear whether Milwaukee intends to offer him a contract. MLB Trade Rumors <a href="https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/10/mlb-arbitration-salaries-2019.html">pegs his salary at $10.1 million</a> in his final year of arbitration, a hefty sum for a small market team to spend on a player with plenty of question marks. Never a patient hitter, Schoop relies on the quality of his contact to generate value with the bat. Worryingly, his exit velocity, launch angle, hard hit percentage, and barrel percentage were all down in 2018, per Statcast; Schoop actually outperformed his <a href="http://m.mlb.com/glossary/statcast/expected-woba">Expected Weighted On-Base Average</a> (xWOBA).</p>
<p>Losing three players for a few weeks of sub-replacement performance would hurt; so would paying $10 M for a player who could end up on the bench. 2019 will be a crucial year for Schoop, no matter whose jersey he ends up wearing.</p>
<h3>Hernán Pérez, UTIL</h3>
<p>Pérez, 28 next Opening Day, continued to slip a little after an exciting 2016 campaign. Even so, he provided average offense (.258 TAv) and credible defense at seven different positions. There’s value in that. Pérez didn’t manage quite as much power in 2018 as he did the previous two seasons, and his K/BB ratio is as unseemly as ever. He shouldn’t be anyone’s idea of a starting player on a playoff-caliber team at this point, but he’s a fine option to have around in case of injury or early-season ineffectiveness. Projected at a reasonable $2.7 million next year <a href="https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/10/mlb-arbitration-salaries-2019.html">by MLB Trade Rumors</a>, he’s a good guy to have around the back end of the roster.</p>
<h3>Tyler Saladino, UTIL</h3>
<p>Saladino made some noise upon his initial promotion to Milwaukee, batting .298 in the first half of the season. But he was injured in May, missed all of June, and looked fairly awful in July and September. So in the end, he wound up with a pretty Saladino-esque line of .246/.302/.398. He’s 29 years old, and is projected to make $1.0 million next year <a href="https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/10/mlb-arbitration-salaries-2019.html">by MLB Trade Rumors</a>. He had a nice year in 2016, running up 1.4 WARP in half a season with the White Sox. That’s looking like the peak of his big league career at this point.</p>
<h2>Minor Leagues</h2>
<h3>Mauricio Dubon, 2B/SS</h3>
<p>The 2018 season could have gone very differently for Mauricio Dubon. The young infielder tore through his first 27 games in Triple-A, batting .343/.348/.574 with some nice doubles power and not too many whiffs. Then he tore through his ACL, and missed the rest of the season. It was a case of bad timing for Dubon and the Brewers; Orlando Arcia and Eric Sogard were struggling with the big club, and Dubon might have been the first man up. Instead, he’ll aim to occupy that position in 2019.</p>
<p>Dubon makes a lot of contact, and routinely runs strikeout rates in the low-to-mid-teens. He’s quick on the base paths, though not a tremendous threat to steal. And he’s teased some intriguing power at various points in his minor league career, though it tends to come and go. Dubon is a capable defender at shortstop, though he fits better at second base long-term. One knock on his game: He doesn’t walk much. Even so, the floor here is something like Hernán Pérez, perhaps with less ability to roam the outfield grass (though it wouldn’t surprise me to see him shagging some extra fly balls in spring training). As for the ceiling? <a href="http://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/77174/who-will-be-the-next-hall-of-famer-for-each-mlb-team">Well… </a></p>
<h3>Keston Hiura, 2B</h3>
<p>Keston Hiura is looking more and more like a blue-chip prospect at the keystone. There’s little remaining doubt about his bat, though he’s oddly susceptible to strikeouts for someone who projects as a Grade 60 or better hitter (on a scale where 50 is average). As many of you know, Hiura combined for a .293 batting average, 13 home runs, and 34 doubles in his first full minor league season, reaching Double-A along the way. Were it not for a minor thumb injury suffered in July, those numbers all may have been better; Hiura’s performance dipped considerably in late July and August. Currently, he’s smacking the ball around to the tune of a .333 average and 30 RBIs in the Arizona Fall League. It’s been said that the man can hit.</p>
<p>Happily, he’s answering questions about his work in the dirt, too. Through last season and into the AFL, Hiura has looked like an average defender at second, maybe a tick below. That’s a great outcome for someone who’s missed so many reps. If Hiura continues to progress at all defensively, he should be able to handle himself just fine at the keystone.</p>
<p>Hiura looks like a threat to hit .300 with 20-25 home runs and a mess of doubles. Even now, he could probably muster a decent-enough slash line against big league pitching. He’ll be up soon; how long the Brewers wait on a promotion may ultimately depend on how well whoever’s making the majority of big league starts is performing.</p>
<h2>Free Agents</h2>
<p>There are a number of interesting names on the free agent market that could help shore up Milwaukee’s infield depth. That’s particularly true if the Brewers buy into Travis Shaw at second and cast around for upgrades at third. Mike Moustakas is a natural target there, as he performed ably for the Brewers down the stretch and quietly offers average skills on both sides of the ball. He’ll likely get a multi-year deal this time out, but the commitment shouldn’t be too costly, in either dollars or years.</p>
<p>Jed Lowrie, Marwin Gonzalez, Josh Harrison, and Neil Walker could all help at either second or third base. Any of those names could sign for between two and four years, with Gonzalez probably representing the best and most expensive option. But even Josh Donaldson may not be out of reach, depending on how leery teams are of his age and injury history.</p>
<p>Should the Brewers feel that Hiura will be ready to make an impact by mid-season, they could be tempted to simply bridge the gap with a cheap one-year deal. The most logical name, in that case, may be Ian Kinsler’s (Kinsler was also mentioned as a possible target by Andrew Salzman in a piece <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/05/weighing-schoop-in-2019/">earlier this month</a>.) Kinsler doesn&#8217;t offer too much with the bat anymore, but he still provides solid defense. He turns 37 next year, and will likely settle for a one-year deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/13/murky-up-the-middle-weighing-middle-infield-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weighing Schoop in 2019</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/05/weighing-schoop-in-2019/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/05/weighing-schoop-in-2019/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Salzman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2019 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2019 Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Kinsler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Schoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keston Hiura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Saladino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deadline acquisition of Jonathan Schoop was not met with great excitement by the Brewers fanbase. Neither his regular season .202 batting average /.246 on-base percentage /.331 slugging percentage slash line, nor his 0-8 postseason batting line, further endeared him to already resistant fans. Schoop’s anemic performance at the plate led to increased playing time [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deadline acquisition of Jonathan Schoop was not met with <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/08/09/jonathan-schoop-is-a-bad-fit/">great excitement</a> by the Brewers fanbase. Neither his regular season .202 batting average /.246 on-base percentage /.331 slugging percentage slash line, nor his 0-8 postseason batting line, further endeared him to already resistant fans. Schoop’s anemic performance at the plate led to increased playing time at second base Travis Shaw. With Mike Moustakas a free agent, Shaw profiles to slide back to third, leaving second base as Schoop’s for the taking … if the Brewers tender him a contract for the 2019 season.</p>
<p>A quick <a href="http://m.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/non-tendered">recap</a> on roster rules: the non-tender deadline this offseason is November 30. By that date, teams have to offer a contract to all players on the 40-man roster with fewer than six years of service time. If the team does not offer a contract to a player, then he becomes a free agent. Because Jonathan Schoop has 5.027 years of Major League <a href="https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/national-league-central/milwaukee-brewers/">service time</a> and has not signed any extension, the Brewers have until November 30 to decide if they want to retain him for next season.</p>
<p>Jonathon Schoop is the <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/season_finder.cgi?request=1&amp;sum=1&amp;as=result_batter&amp;offset=0&amp;type=b&amp;min_year_season=1871&amp;max_year_season=2018&amp;min_season=1&amp;max_season=-1&amp;min_age=0&amp;max_age=26&amp;lg_ID=lgAny&amp;lgAL_team=tmAny&amp;lgNL_team=tmAny&amp;lgFL_team=tmAny&amp;lgAA_team=tmAny&amp;lgPL_team=tmAny&amp;lgUA_team=tmAny&amp;lgNA_team=tmAny&amp;isActive=either&amp;isHOF=either&amp;isAllstar=either&amp;bats=any&amp;throws=any&amp;exactness=anymarked&amp;pos_4=1&amp;games_min_max=min&amp;games_prop=50&amp;qualifiersSeason=nomin&amp;minpasValS=502&amp;mingamesValS=100&amp;qualifiersCareer=nomin&amp;minpasValC=3000&amp;mingamesValC=1000&amp;c1criteria=HR&amp;c1gtlt=gt&amp;c1val=110&amp;c2gtlt=gt&amp;c3gtlt=gt&amp;c4gtlt=gt&amp;c5gtlt=gt&amp;c5val=1.0&amp;location=pob&amp;locationMatch=is&amp;orderby=HR&amp;number_matched=1">greatest</a> young power hitting second baseman of all time. There’s a lot to unpack there, but if we wanted to measure by players twenty-six and under who have played at least fifty percent of their games at second base, he’s hit the most home runs. However, impressive raw home run totals don’t necessarily mean a player is a <a href="https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/card/70613/joey-gallo">star</a>; even with that fun fact to his name, Schoop’s bat completely fell apart in 2018 after showing so much promise in 2017.</p>
<p>As a twenty-five year old second basemen in 2017, Schoop had a .280 True Average (TAv) and produced 37.6 Value Over Replacement Player (VORP), which estimates the number of runs Schoop produced beyond a freely available minor league replacement. <a href="https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/card/66391/jonathan-schoop">PECOTA</a> pegged him for a regression with .256 TAv and 15.8 VORP, yet his numbers sunk lower. Schoop’s plate discipline remained remarkably similar. His swing rate rose four percentage points to 56.8 percent, while his contact rate (71.4) and swinging strike rate (28.6) remained virtually unchanged from 2017, so his <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/schoojo01-bat.shtml">strikeout percentage</a> only rose from twenty-one percent to twenty-three percent. The biggest difference is that his walk rate sunk from 5.2 percent to 3.8 percent, both of which are below average. Schoop’s walk rate would have placed him in the bottom five of all <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2018-ratio-batting.shtml">qualified hitters</a> if he’d had enough at bats.</p>
<p>As I <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/08/13/weekend-recap-schoop-and-lyles/">noted</a> back in August, there was no smoking gun on Schoop’s poor performance at the plate, he just wasn’t hitting the ball as well. From that article’s publication date on August 13<sup>th</sup>, <a href="https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jonathan-schoop-570731?stats=career-r-hitting-mlb">Statcast</a> numbers only slightly recovered. Even with some improvement his barrel percentage, exit velocity, launch angle, and hard hit percentage all were career lows. His expected WOBA placed in the bottom 1 percent of all hitters.</p>
<p>The Brewers traded for a player they probably saw as a buy low candidate. If they elect to offer Schoop arbitration, it likely means that they see something in his 2018 performance that they believe can be corrected to get him back to his 2017 numbers.</p>
<p>One <a href="https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/10/mlb-arbitration-salaries-2019.html">projection</a> for Schoop’s potential arbitration award places him at a $10.1M salary in 2019, which would be 3<sup>rd</sup> on the team in <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iRU5sB7gfLjmcDpAu1cIe6BBBRFgmZUN0lvxpdS5Spc/pubhtml">salary</a>, just above Christian Yelich, in case you needed another reminder about how great that contract is for the Brewers. The only other potential second basemen on the <a href="http://m.brewers.mlb.com/mil/roster/40-man/">40-man roster</a>, presuming that Shaw is back at third base on Opening Day, are Tyler Saladino, Hernan Perez and Mauricio Dubon. None of these players are projected as a starting caliber player on a contending team.] in 2019.</p>
<p>The most intriguing internal option to replace Schoop would be Keston Hiura. Our mother site’s midseason top 50 prospects list had Hiura at number five and <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/article/41327/2018-prospects-the-midseason-top-50/">claimed</a> that Hiura was “basically major-league ready” back when it was posted in mid-July. If the team agrees with the assessment, then he could be the starting at second by May 1, with service time manipulation likely preventing him from starting the season with the big-league club. While he’s considered a bat-first prospect, if the Brewers could shift and game plan their way into making Travis Shaw <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/article/41327/2018-prospects-the-midseason-top-50/">league average</a> at second, fans shouldn’t be too worried about Hiura.</p>
<p>The Brewers could also look at potential free agents who could sign a one-year deal and provide flexibility in case the team wants to wait on Hiura (or if he proves not to be ready). Ian Kinsler had a terrible post-trade run with the Red Sox capped with baserunning and fielding blunders in Game 3 of the World Series. However, he provided above average defense according to Fielding Runs Above Average (<a href="https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/index.php?cid=2561954">FRAA</a>) (even if it wasn’t quite Gold Glove worthy). If you squint, his offense wasn’t terrible in 2018! From his nadir on May 28 through his trade to Boston on July 30, he <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=kinslia01&amp;t=b&amp;year=2018#1714-1764-sum:batting_gamelogs">slashed</a> .286/.349/.518, which is above his career line of .271/.339/.443. One wouldn’t expect a two-month hot streak to be his baseline production going forward, but it does show he has some life left in his bat, and could serve a useful role as a bridge to Hiura.</p>
<p>The Brewers are lucky to be in the position where they don’t need to double down on the Schoop trade. It would hurt the front office’s external perception to write off the acquisition as a total loss after three months of poor production, but I don’t believe that’s going to factor into their calculation. Milwaukee is always going to operate on a limited <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/10/31/spending-expectations/">budget</a>, but if the team decides its best choices are Schoop and Hiura, two different budget issues arise. Is the team willing to keep Schoop at more than $10 M when there’s a non-zero chance he’s not worth a roster spot? If Hiura shines in spring training and proves he’s the best player for the team, are they willing to ignore service time considerations and have him start the season with the team? If not, who would cover the gap of at least two weeks? Milwaukee’s front office has a few weeks to make these decisions, but whichever direction they turn will shed light on their internal evaluations of the players in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/11/05/weighing-schoop-in-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grading the System 3</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/08/01/grading-the-system-3/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/08/01/grading-the-system-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Zettel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers trade deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brice Turang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caden Lemons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Herrera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corbin Burnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Carmona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joakim Soria trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Schoop trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Villar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keston Hiura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodi Medeiros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcos Diplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Feliciano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moustakas trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Arcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Grisham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trey Supak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tristen Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troy Stokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilber Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zack Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The splash happened: For two-and-a-half years, Brewers fans and analysts wondered aloud what it might take for GM David Stearns to trade an impact prospect at the trade deadline. The debate softened somewhat during the 2017-2018 offseason, as Stearns certainly proved himself capable of parting with (several) impact prospects. This transaction was always explained away, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The splash happened: For two-and-a-half years, Brewers fans and analysts wondered aloud what it might take for GM David Stearns to trade an impact prospect at the trade deadline. The debate softened somewhat during the 2017-2018 offseason, as Stearns certainly proved himself capable of parting with (several) impact prospects. This transaction was always explained away, as the deal involved five years of control for Christian Yelich, a true-prime, potentially top tier outfielder, the rare player with a 5.0 WARP season under the belt that still maintained a sense that we had yet to see it all come together. This transaction was never used as evidence that Stearns would certainly trade impact prospects if the price was right, for the time horizon of Yelich&#8217;s continued development and elite potential made the deal an anomaly.</p>
<p>Stearns just loudly answered that question this trade deadline.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">2018 Deadline</th>
<th align="center">Brewers Trade</th>
<th align="center">Brewers Receive</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">7/26/18</td>
<td align="center">LHP Kodi Medeiros / RHP Wilber Perez</td>
<td align="center">RHP Joakim Soria</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">7/27/18</td>
<td align="center">OF Brett Phillips / RHP Jorge Lopez</td>
<td align="center">3B Mike Moustakas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">7/31/18</td>
<td align="center">IF Jonathan Villar / RHP Luis Ortiz / SS Jean Carmona</td>
<td align="center">2B Jonathan Schoop</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What is fascinating about each of these trades is that they are fantastic in the sense of bolstering an MLB roster, in order to ensure that this stretch run features as few weaknesses as possible, while also potentially being over-pays in each case. Yet it should be stressed that these overpays are palatable for several reasons: the Brewers maintain a largely controllable roster that is also relatively inexpensive; the Brewers have a relatively large set of players that have been minor leaguers long enough to need potential 40-man roster protection entering 2019; and, perhaps most importantly, there is an incredible amount of role risk involved with each player. These trades should provide grounds for further analysis into when and how potential overpays are helpful to a team, and they should certainly provide further evidence that WARP/$ is not the sole determination of a trade&#8217;s potential value or impact.</p>
<p><em><strong>Grading the System</strong></em>: <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/08/02/grading-the-system/">2016</a> || <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/08/02/grading-the-system-2/">2017</a></p>
<ul>
<li>Make no mistake about it, in terms of developing multiple quality pitches, command, and velocity, Luis Ortiz could potentially have the best pitching role for the Brewers system; there was a time, two years ago even, where it would not have been absurd for Ortiz to fight for a top tier pitching role in the prospect ranking cycle (and, really, it was not absurd). But Ortiz has been around <em>forever</em> in the advanced minors, it seems, without working full seasons. For example, the injury-fighting righty has 225 innings at Double-A without working 100 innings in a season, and with 68 innings at the 2018 deadline he could potentially miss 100 innings once again. If Ortiz can take his next step forward in the Orioles&#8217; system, he is absolutely a more valuable asset, in terms of roster surplus, than Jonathan Schoop (and it is not close!!!), but that strong <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/30902/2017-prospects-milwaukee-brewers-top-10-prospects/">60 Overall Future Potential (OFP) / 50 likely grade entering 2017</a> looks much more improbable. Ortiz is eligible for the Rule 5 draft for the 2019 season and almost certainly must be protected by the Orioles.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Jean Carmona just made the jump stateside for the Brewers in 2018, and thus remains a full four levels away from the MLB. Additionally, Carmona might even be another year away from a clearly defined MLB potential role. In this regard, I do not envy the job of MLB scouts and analytics personnel, as it&#8217;s not entirely clear for me how I would price Carmona&#8217;s potential future value in terms of long-term systemic development.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>At BP Milwaukee, Kyle Lesniewski describe the roles and risks associated with both Kodi Medeiros and Wilber Perez. Medeiros could become an impact reliever at the MLB level, and it&#8217;s not unlikely that some observers still believe that he could start in some capacity, as there will always be hold outs for that sort of role. Given Medeiros&#8217;s delivery and command profile, however, as well as his fastball, Lesniewski outlines the difficulties that Medeiros may have for reaching even an impact reliever profile. Medeiros is eligible for the Rule 5 draft entering the 2019 season, and almost certainly must be protected by the White Sox, while Perez had yet to play stateside in the Brewers system.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Finally, I already <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/07/28/playoff-payoff/">detailed the roles and surplus value for Brett Phillips and Jorge Lopez</a>, so I will not go into too much detail here. However, I will add that of each of the prospects included in this midseason deals, Phillips is arguably the most likely to have MLB floor and ceiling roles that both surpass the value of the trade return (which is not a knock against Mike Moustakas, he simply might only be in Milwaukee for a couple of months). With a prospect such as Corey Ray coming on strong in Double-A Biloxi, not to mention the considerable development of Troy Stokes Jr. at the advanced level as well, Milwaukee cannot necessarily lose sleep over trading away a depth outfielder from their stacked group when they are fighting a close divisional deficit and leading the National League Wild Card race.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Potential Role Replication</th>
<th align="center">Loss</th>
<th align="center">2019 Rule 5?</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Depth RHP Reliever</td>
<td align="center">Jorge Lopez</td>
<td align="center">Bubba Derby</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Depth LHP Reliever</td>
<td align="center">Kodi Medeiros</td>
<td align="center">Quintin Torres-Costa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Depth OF</td>
<td align="center">Brett Phillips</td>
<td align="center">Troy Stokes Jr.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, readers will witness a couple of recurring facts in these trades: the Brewers largely traded away players that must be protected for 2019 to avoid their loss via the Rule 5 draft, or players with little-to-no stateside development experience (and thus years to reach MLB), and/or players with roles that may be replicated within a year. One need not believe that a player like Stokes will surpass Phillips, in terms of overall ceiling, to see the value of the young prospect&#8217;s potential to fill an MLB depth position in 2019. Phillips himself may not have had an opportunity in 2019 to take such a role. The same logic might apply to Quintin Torres-Costa and Bubba Derby. This should not be construed to mean that these current system prospects are categorically better than Phillips / Medeiros / Lopez; in fact, I would have ranked each of that trio ahead of their potential 2019 depth replacements. But once again, since systemic development, contending windows, and player development cycles are now orbiting a club that is contending for consecutive seasons (and the foreseeable future, hopefully), if it costs system depth roles to improve MLB weaknesses, the Brewers have to eat the risk of losing those ceilings.</p>
<p>I like when MLB trades can simply be called good baseball moves. For all the rebuilding narratives in Baltimore, Kansas City, and Chicago, the White Sox, Royals, and Orioles front offices arguably made sensible trades with quality returns that both have long and short time horizons and development cycles. Milwaukee is working as a true contender without trading from their most elite potential prospect stash. This is good all around.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Stearns priced out these converging development cycles and adroitly moved the future role risk to address an offense that absolutely needed help for a serious contending run. Just the other day I wrote, &#8220;At worst, Travis Shaw has simply begun a potential shift over to the right side of the infield, where he might serve as a viable first base option for 2019 should the Brewers and Moustakas exercise his mutual option for 2019,&#8221; without thinking that a realistic move to first base for Shaw could occur as early as this week. Now, with Jonathan Schoop in the mix for second base and Jesus Aguilar slumping, Shaw becomes a strong side platoon option at 1B to form a <em>serious</em> infield unit:</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Potential Infield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">1B Travis Shaw</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2B Jonathan Schoop</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">3B Mike Moustakas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SS Orlando Arcia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This infield could open 2019 should Stearns consider keeping both Moustakas and Schoop, and now the talk can turn to development cycles once more. While the Brewers continue to season second baseman Keston Hiura at the most advanced levels of the minor leagues, Schoop basically serves as an upgrade over the Jonathan Villar gamble (gambling that he&#8217;ll return to his 2016 form), thus giving the Brewers a quality starting option while Hiura completes his minor league development. While Hiura&#8217;s bat is arguably ready for the MLB, and has been mentioned as a potential MLB option by <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/article/41327/2018-prospects-the-midseason-top-50/">Baseball Prospectus in their latest Top 50 list</a>, the infielder may need more work in the field after missing significant fielding development time due to an extended elbow injury. Once Hiura is ready in 2019, a Schoop / Hiura mix simply extends the #TeamDepth mantra, and the same can arguably said for the remainder of the infield.</p>
<hr />
<p>Entering 2018, the Brewers system took a step back in terms of organizational rankings, due to a series of developmental setbacks for key prospects, MLB graduations, and trades. I began to highlight this during last year&#8217;s &#8220;Grading the System&#8221; feature, but as one can never predict baseball, the development cycles and potential OFP assessments calibrated for Corey Ray, Keston Hiura answered a <em>crucial</em> risk question (can he play 2B?), and a veritable gang of pop-up pitchers continued to march upward in the system, potentially boosting and extending the no-name, depth-oriented pitching staff into 2019. Make no mistake about it, the system might continue to rank in the middle of the league in terms of overall quality, and the set of clear potential impact roles (true 60 OFP+ roles) may end with Keston Hiura and Corey Ray should Corbin Burnes exhaust his rookie standing through the end of 2018.</p>
<p>Yet, given the instant development of 2018 First Round draft pick Brice Turang, the Brewers could demonstrate that they indeed nabbed an Elite Prep prospect that fell due to prospect fatigue. Turang could quickly help to boost the top of the system as an MLB potential role falls into place. Moreover, given the Brewers&#8217; expanded efforts in International signings, as well as the quality use of signing bonus allocations in each of the last two MLB drafts, the lower minors could continue to host a variety of players that suddenly surge onto the prospect scene. While this does not make the Brewers system different than many other MLB systems, it provides a road map to how the club can continue to develop talent while contending. One could argue that it&#8217;s absurd to suggest that the Brewers &#8220;rely&#8221; on someone like Turang falling in the MLB draft, but this is exactly the type of prospect perception and role foresight that the Brewers must have if they are going to succeed while drafting in the bottom half of each round.</p>
<p>Of course, the notable graduations from the system should not be undersold as well. Now there are so many starters, depth roles, and trades from the Brewers prospect stock that I added a new category this year:</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">MLB Graduates &amp; Trades (T)</th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">FA / 2011 / 2012 / 2013</td>
<td align="center">RHP Jacob Barnes</td>
<td align="center">LHP Brent Suter</td>
<td align="center">RHP Taylor Williams</td>
<td align="center">IF Nate Orf</td>
<td align="center">RHP Jorge Lopez (T)</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2014 / 2015 /2 016</td>
<td align="center">RHP Brandon Woodruff</td>
<td align="center">RHP Corbin Burnes</td>
<td align="center">OF Monte Harrison (T)</td>
<td align="center">RHP Jordan Yamamoto (T)</td>
<td align="center">LHP Kodi Medeiros (T)</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Trades (2015)</td>
<td align="center">OF Domingo Santana</td>
<td align="center">RHP Zach Davies</td>
<td align="center">RHP Corey Knebel</td>
<td align="center">LHP Josh Hader</td>
<td align="center">RHP Adrian Houser</td>
<td align="center">OF Brett Phillips (T)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Trades (2016)</td>
<td align="center">OF Keon Broxton</td>
<td align="center">C Jacob Nottingham</td>
<td align="center">IF Jonathan Villar (T)</td>
<td align="center">OF Lewis Brinson (T)</td>
<td align="center">RHP Luis Ortiz (T)</td>
<td align="center">2B Isan Diaz (T)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Trades (2016-2017)</td>
<td align="center">C Manny Pina</td>
<td align="center">RHP Freddy Peralta</td>
<td align="center">RHP Aaron Wilkerson</td>
<td align="center">C Jett Bandy</td>
<td align="center">IF Wendell Rijo (T)</td>
<td align="center">C Andrew Susac (T)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">International</td>
<td align="center">SS Orlando Arcia</td>
<td align="center">SS Jean Carmona (T)</td>
<td align="center">Wilber Perez (T)</td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Now, with these graduates in mind, what does a somewhat thinner, but still rather interesting Brewers system look like?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Prospect Key</span><br />
<em><strong>Top 10 Consideration</strong></em><br />
<em>Top 30 Consideration</em><br />
[Just Interesting]</p>
<p>Of course, it is also worth emphasizing how the system has been&#8230;.decimated in key areas. Given the quick development by advanced prospects acquired from the major 2015-2016 trades, as well as the huge trades entering 2018 and during the recent deadlines, the pool of potential impact prospects acquiring via trade has waned:</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Trades (For Season)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><em><strong>IF Mauricio Dubon (2017)</strong></em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong><em>RHP Marcos Diplan (2015)</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong><em>RHP Carlos Herrera (2016)</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong><em>RHP Trey Supak (2016)</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">[IF Yeison Coca (2017)]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">[RHP Bubba Derby (2016)]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">[RHP Phil Bickford (2016)]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">[RHP Chad Whitmer (2018)]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This is an important category to consider simply because Milwaukee demonstrated how adroit trades could quickly rebuild a system and reform an MLB roster. It will be worth watching to see if the Stearns continues to attempt to find Jonathan Villar and Keon Broxton types via trade now that the club is solidly contending. Of course, one could argue that Stearns is always trying to find this player (be it Oliver Drake, or Jesus Aguilar, or even Alec Asher), but that it simply the fact that these players will not always come via trade.</p>
<p>Thanks to the mechanical corrections, good health, and overall development of Corey Ray, as well as the surging role of Troy Stokes Jr., the development of draft prospects arguably has a better outlook entering 2019 than it did prior to 2018. Given the advancement of Corbin Burnes into a relief role, Brandon Woodruff and Taylor Williams into respective swingman and depth relief roles, and Brett Phillips into a fourth outfielder, it is clear that the Brewers front office is considering all possible role developments with each player (rather than following a cookie cutter model, or a model in which each prospect must immediately receive playing time in their clearest future role). It is arguable that this type of development strategy could maximize roles ranging from Stokes to Zack Brown, Jake Gatewood, and maybe even Lucas Erceg.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Prospects by Draft</th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2011 / 2012 / 2013 / 2014</td>
<td align="center"><strong><em>OF Troy Stokes</em></strong></td>
<td align="center"><em>1B Jake Gatewood</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>RHP Devin Williams</em></td>
<td align="center">[OF Tyrone Taylor]</td>
<td align="center">[C Dustin Houle]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2015</td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>OF Trent Grisham</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em>RHP Cody Ponce</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>LHP Quintin Torres-Costa</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Demi Orimoloye</em></td>
<td align="center">[LHP Nathan Kirby]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2016</td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>OF Corey Ray</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>RHP Zack Brown</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>C Mario Feliciano</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>3B Lucas Erceg</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em>RHP Thomas Jankins</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2017</td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>2B Keston Hiura</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><strong><em>RHP Caden Lemons</em></strong></td>
<td align="center"><strong><em>OF Tristen Lutz</em></strong></td>
<td align="center"><em>C KJ Harrison</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Je&#8217;Von Ward</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2018</td>
<td align="center"><em><strong>SS Brice Turang</strong></em></td>
<td align="center"><em>LHP Aaron Ashby</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Micah Bello</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Joe Gray</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>[Injured Drew Rasmussen]</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Meanwhile, Milwaukee signed a couple of additional potential impact International Amateur free agents this July, continuing an attempt to build up the low minors. Carlos Rodriguez and Larry Ernesto are already making some noise in the Dominican Summer League, while prospects like Jose Sibrian and Jesus Lujano have made the leap stateside.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Brewers International</th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2015</td>
<td align="center"><em>SS Luis Manon</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Aaron Familia</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>C Jose Sibrian</em></td>
<td align="center">OF Jesus Lujano</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2016</td>
<td align="center">OF Pablo Abreu</td>
<td align="center">OF Francis Tolentino</td>
<td align="center">SS Victor Maria</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2017</td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Carlos Rodriguez</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Larry Ernesto</em></td>
<td align="center">OF Jeicor Cristian</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2018</td>
<td align="center"><em>SS Eduardo Garcia</em></td>
<td align="center"><em>OF Eduarqi Fernandez</em></td>
<td align="center">SS Branlyn Jarba</td>
<td align="center">OF Erys Bautista</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Frankly, this Brewers system will not look as strong, in terms of potentially elite impacts roles, as the one that received ranking for 2018 at Baseball Prospectus. Yet, as new cycles of player development depth emerge in the low minors, and the Brewers continue their unique form of MLB roster construction (clearly using all 40 roster spots for MLB-adjacent roles and frequently shuffling those roles), Milwaukee could be an organizational well-suited to do more with less. For if 2017 fired the opening shot that the Brewers <em>can</em> contend simply based on giving high floor players a chance to work in the MLB, 2018 is advancing that ideal and carrying it to deeper logical, promotional, and transactional extensions.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Photo Credit: Gary A. Vasquez, USA Today Sports Images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/08/01/grading-the-system-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>83</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/wild-card-contender/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/wild-card-contender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Zettel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 PECOTA day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Houser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball Prospectus PECOTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boone Logan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers 2018 PECOTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers PECOTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Yelich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corbin Burnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Knebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domingo Santana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Barnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Nottingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Jeffress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Hader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Brinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lorenzo Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Albers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Braun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=11097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, amidst some projections that suggested the Milwaukee Brewers would struggle to beat the 70-win mark, PECOTA stuck with bullish preseason estimates in the upper-70s. The deep Brewers roster was also bolstered by high floor developing players like Domingo Santana and Zach Davies, as well as second-chancers like Travis Shaw and Chase Anderson, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, amidst some projections that suggested the Milwaukee Brewers would struggle to beat the 70-win mark, PECOTA stuck with bullish preseason estimates in the upper-70s. The deep Brewers roster was also bolstered by high floor developing players like Domingo Santana and Zach Davies, as well as second-chancers like Travis Shaw and Chase Anderson, and the club outperformed even those rosy estimates. Now, on PECOTA 2018 day, the Brewers are stuck right back where their Run Differentials (Runs Scored / Runs Allowed) placed them all last year: 83 wins. Against an atrophied Cubs roster that has to-date remained silent on the top pitching free agents (and, really, remained silent overall), the Brewers gained significant ground, closing the double-digit 2017 preseason gap to a handful of projected wins for 2018. Should the Brewers make good on their rumored / expected starting pitching move, the club could further close the gap against the frontrunning Lakeview Nine. 83 keeps the Brewers on par with the reloading St. Louis Cardinals, who have also had a relatively active offseason, and right behind Wild Card leaders out west (this time around, it&#8217;s Colorado that is projected to fall behind, while Arizona and San Francisco contend).</p>
<p>Baseball Prospectus:<br />
<a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/37603/flu-like-symptoms-pecota-hates-favorite-team/">Why PECOTA Hates Your Favorite Team</a><br />
<a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/37606/lineup-card-13-noteworthy-pecota-projections/">13 Noteworthy Projections</a></p>
<p>Since PECOTA is a probabilistic model, which means that it is designed to reflect the most probable outcome in a distribution of projected outcomes, Brewers fans should keep in mind that &#8220;84&#8221; is not some special or magic number. As demonstrated last season, a club that was expected (at best) to flirt with .500 surged ahead and competed for the playoffs, but that surge was not even greater than one standard deviation away from the projected win total. These Brewers could indeed use their strengths to once again push the club ahead of schedule by contending for a playoff spot or winning the division in 2018, or they could indeed sputter in development patterns or role depreciation and return closer to .500. What PECOTA reflects is that the Brewers&#8217; big offseason moves (trading for Christian Yelich, signing Lorenzo Cain) did not guarantee them a playoff spot or even playoff contention, but instead, &#8220;more probable&#8221; competition or &#8220;more probable&#8221; playoff contention.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s going to make the Brewers &#8220;tick&#8221; in 2018? Here are my favorite picks from 2018 Brewers PECOTA:</p>
<p><em><strong>PECOTA &#8220;punts&#8221; the Yelich Trade</strong></em><br />
Standing behind the curtain during some of the PECOTA work throughout the offseason, it was very interesting to see that the trade involving Lewis Brinson, Monte Harrison, Isan Diaz, and Jordan Yamamoto for Christian Yelich&#8230;.did not really &#8220;move the needle&#8221; on the Brewers&#8217; 2018 expected win total. This is surprising given the court of public opinion, but there are two specific reasons that the trade does not immediately yield an absurd advantage for the 2018 Brewers: (1) Lewis Brinson&#8217;s high floor is <em>real</em>, and (2) Christian Yelich could experience some role depreciation. It&#8217;s always so easy to look at the best possible outcomes or potentialities in each trade; Brinson the future superstar, Yelich the 5.0 WARP player, but it&#8217;s also worth emphasizing Brinson&#8217;s risk in reaching his peak role and Yelich&#8217;s fluctuation between varying degrees of serviceable-to-great production.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong: Christian Yelich is a very good baseball player, and his contract makes him worth every potential prospect future that the Brewers surrendered. PECOTA thinks so, too, projecting Yelich primarily as a Brewers left fielder working a .279 TAv and serviceable fielding at a corner position. That&#8217;s good for 2.7 WARP, second only to Lorenzo Cain (3.5 WARP). But, remember that floor for Brinson? Even if the center fielder fails to reach his fullest and best hit tool (and therefore, fullest and best power) in the MLB, he&#8217;s still a speedy, strong defense, strong arm player in the center of the diamond. PECOTA projects Brinson at .262 TAv and an overall plus on defense for the Marlins, which is good for a club leading 2.5 WARP. This is great for both teams: the Brewers land a quality outfielder under control for five years who has already shown his developed peak abilities at the MLB level (while rounding out the club with a left-handed bat and better plate discipline), while Marlins fans immediately landed the face of their rebuild, the best player on their team, and (at best) someone who neutralizes the toxic offseason orchestrations of Project Wolverine.</p>
<p><em><strong>Zach Davies and Orlando Arcia Remain Quietly Competitive</strong></em><br />
As mentioned, the Brewers contended in 2017 due to the &#8220;high floor&#8221; strengths of their youngsters: players like Orlando Arcia and Zach Davies were not set up to be immediate superstars, but still maintained quality, consistent MLB seasons that propelled the team along &#8220;behind the scenes.&#8221; PECOTA projects the same for 2018, although this time Zach Davies is leading the pitching staff with a solid 4.43 DRA over 170+ innings, good for a 1.6 WARP. Arcia sits behind Cain and Yelich in terms of overall WARP, but the young shortstop is projected to continue onward with excellent defense and a serviceable bat at shortstop. One could look at these players&#8217; projections and emphasize that PECOTA sees them declining from their absolute 2017 WARP, but I don&#8217;t think the WARP is the point here. Instead, what matters is that this duo is still viewed as a quality backbone of the club, even with some attrition, which will undoubtedly serve crucial roles for grinding through 162.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Outfield Depth is a Problem</strong></em><br />
Projecting the Brewers&#8217; outfield depth was a nightmare. I previously wrote about how a rotational system can make five outfield spots work for Yelich, Cain, Santana, Ryan Braun, and Brett Phillips, but it&#8217;s much more difficult to put those ideals into the mixer and dissect the potential probabilities. Probability #1, which PECOTA currently projects sans Santana trade, is that Ryan Braun plays right field, but only some first base and left field, and therefore loses all of his defensive value. Both Braun and Santana suffer in this universe, creating a total of 1.9 WARP (but 75 extra base hits!) and TAv below .280. Comparable players for Domingo Santana are Oswaldo Arcia, Jonny Gomes, and Joc Pederson, and his plate discipline regresses (98 strike outs and 36 walks in 315 plate appearances). Granted, I do think there is still a path of optimism about the current roster depth (perhaps Braun works 1B more frequently, and Santana receives more regular playing time across the outfield, interleague designated hitter, and pinch hitting roles), but I do not think that means PECOTA is categorically mistaken for the pessimistic trends for Braun or Santana. After all, the current roster mash up is designed in a way to particularly showcase flaws for both Braun and Santana, which does not mean they&#8217;re bad baseball players (in fact, their TAv are projected to contend for best overall offensive production on the club), they simply may be imperfect ballplayers for this current roster.</p>
<p><em><strong>Chase Anderson is Chase Anderson</strong></em><br />
There are many good stories about the 2017 Brewers, but it&#8217;s tough to find one that&#8217;s better than Anderson&#8217;s arrival as an impact starting pitcher. Anderson resonated with Brewers fans not simply because he was a previous low-to-mid rotation depth option who arrived as one of the very best pitchers in the National League, but because he also vindicated the mechanical, analytical, and strategic approach of pitching coach Derek Johnson. In 2018, PECOTA projects some of 2016 Anderson to return, particularly in the shape of walks, hits, and home runs, without phenomenal gains in strike outs or ground balls. Underlying modeling views Anderson as one of the most likely pitchers on the Brewers to &#8220;collapse&#8221; in 2018, and less likely to &#8220;improve,&#8221; and it&#8217;s not hard to squint and see a scenario in which a comparable of Dustin McGowan is suitable for the righty&#8217;s age-30 campaign. Even with all of this noted, Anderson&#8217;s DRA is projected at 4.59 for the year, which should be a better than average performance if the offensive environment holds steady. There is value in that performance over 168.0 innings pitched, and this type of season still validates the contract extension that Anderson signed.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Bullpen is Fantastic</em></strong><br />
As a group, the primary Brewers bullpen as currently constructed looks fantastic. Josh Hader and Corey Knebel are projected as the most likely relievers to improve in 2018, but Jeremy Jeffress, Boone Logan, and Matt Albers also receive relatively strong scores in the category. The current main group is projected to produce a DRA below 4.30, which should demonstrate the potential for average or better production in most offensive environments that the arms face in 2018. Some red flags float beneath the surface, however, as the walk rates are slightly worse than average for the relief group, and outside of Adrian Houser, Jeffress, Albers, and Jacob Barnes the group is projected to have relatively low ground ball rates. Yet, even outside of Knebel and Hader the relievers are projected as a strong strike out group, suggesting that some of the slider-heavy moves of the offseason should pay dividends in high leverage situations.</p>
<p><em><strong>Prospects Begin Appearing on the Scene</strong></em><br />
One of my favorite aspects of digging into PECOTA projections is the appearance of new faces to the MLB. Caden Lemons, Keston Hiura, KJ Harrison, and Tristen Lutz are all listed as highly improbable MLB players by PECOTA, but their appearance on the radar after the 2017 draft means that the system is now generating comparable players for this group. Jacob Nottingham was added to the 40-Man Roster at the beginning of the 2017-2018 offseason, and one of the comparable names that popped up in his player line is Jonathan Lucroy, which is fascinating for many reasons (not the least of which is Lucroy&#8217;s general reputation as a defense-first catcher for the beginning of his career, and Nottinghma&#8217;s floor as a back-up catcher with pop). Mauricio Dubon appears as one of the more probable MLB prospects for the club, and his line is a <em>very</em> serviceable utility infielder (.250 batting average, .380 slugging percentage).</p>
<p>Brewers fans might be most excited to see Corbin Burnes at the bottom of the club&#8217;s starting pitcher list with three starts, as the pop-up righty prospect is given relatively favorable odds to reach the MLB and a set of comparable players that effectively grade out his reliever risk, reliever potential, and (most excitingly) his starting pitching potential. Additionally, Adrian Houser is given lower odds of reaching the MLB in 2018, but seeing the power sinker reliever in the mix leads to an exciting scenario where the entire Carlos Gomez / Mike Fiers trade return is potentially playing with the Brewers during the <em>same season</em>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good reminder that even though common perception is that the Brewers system took a big hit with the Christian Yelich trade, there is still an intriguing group of prospects potentially knocking at the door for 2018. Add an asterisk to this potential 83-win season, as one that exhibits contending-ready talent and depth roles that are still developing for more future success.</p>
<hr />
<p>Photo Credit: Ken Blaze, USAToday Sports Images</p>
<p>Edit: Updated at 7:15 AM to reflect updated win total, from 84 to 83.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/wild-card-contender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if the Brewers Don&#8217;t Sign Neil Walker?</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/11/what-if-the-brewers-dont-sign-neil-walker/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/11/what-if-the-brewers-dont-sign-neil-walker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Victor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2017 Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers roster analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers free agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers roster analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Sogard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hernan Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Villar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Walker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This offseason has been infamously slow, and the Brewers have made only minor adjustments to their big league roster thus far.  A flurry of moves are undoubtedly still to come, as Yu Darvish, Jake Arrieta, and J.D. Martinez still remain unsigned. But with spring training about five weeks away, the chance that the Brewers have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This offseason has been infamously slow, and the Brewers have made only minor adjustments to their big league roster thus far.  A flurry of moves are undoubtedly still to come, as Yu Darvish, Jake Arrieta, and J.D. Martinez still remain unsigned. But with spring training about five weeks away, the chance that the Brewers have their Opening Day roster already mostly settled increases by the day.</p>
<p>In 2017, Jonathan Villar performed so badly that the club had to bring in Neil Walker to play second base while they pushed for the playoffs.  Although they fell short and missed the wild card game, Walker performed admirably.  In 38 games with Milwaukee, Walker posted a .305 True Average (TAv) and was worth 0.9 Wins Above Replacement Player (WARP).  One win from Walker in a quarter of the season is a good output, as it represented an upgrade over Villar’s season-long .242 TAv and 0.8 WARP.</p>
<p>As we are all aware, though, the Brewers have not yet re-signed Walker.  The only infield transactions they’ve made have been re-signing Eric Sogard and adding Mauricio Dubon to the 40-man roster.  Both Sogard and Dubon profile as more utility types than everyday second basemen, though, so their presence should not preclude an actual upgrade.  Both are capable of playing the position, but neither is good enough that the Brewers—a team with playoff aspirations—should be satisfied.</p>
<p>Walker is the most obvious solution.  He is not a superstar, but he is a solid player, and he may be available on a shorter, one- or two-year deal because the free agent market has collapsed.  From 2013 through 2016, Walker had been worth between 2.9 and 3.5 WARP.  That is a valuable player, and that level of consistency would be useful for a team that will be relying on some high-variability players (Lewis Brinson, Orlando Arcia) for their playoff push in 2018.  Even during last season, which was a down year by Walker’s standards, was not actually that bad, as his cumulative 1.7 WARP still made him worthy of a roster spot.</p>
<p>But as I mentioned above, the offseason is coming to a close, and the Brewers are running out of time.  This doesn’t matter so much if Walker is the solution, because the free agent market as a whole is moving slowly.  But if Walker signs elsewhere, the late date in the calendar makes working on a contingency plan more difficult.  Free agents are likely to sign quickly once the dominoes start falling simply because of the lack of time left in the winter, and the <a href="https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018-mlb-free-agent-tracker/positions-3">second base free agent market</a> is not that deep.  There just aren’t that many exciting options; Danny Espinosa is the only one who appears slightly intriguing.</p>
<p>This late stature in the offseason also matters because it decreases the amount of time for a potential trade.  I don’t know what the Brewers front office is working on, and I imagine they are working on upgrades at basically every position.  But they cannot be pursuing every angle at once, so if Walker is the first choice, then pivoting to finding trade partners will still take some time.</p>
<p>Spring training is quite long, so one could argue that there is no need to make a move in the next month anyway.  A spring training trade, or even an April trade, would bring in a player early enough that the Brewers’ overall season would not be impacted.  The front office does not stop working once spring training starts or Opening Day arrives, so whether reinforcements arrive on January 30 or March 30 may not matter all that much.  The timing of these moves do matter, though, because the Brewers are at a bit of a crossroads in terms of how willing they are to push for the playoffs this year.  If they are waiting until March or April to address this kind of need, then they are unlikely to also be investing resources in a starting pitcher.  Thus, while the timing of when exactly a new second baseman arrives is mostly irrelevant, it would be indicative of the club’s broader strategy.</p>
<p>This article works on the assumption that an upgrade is needed, and I think the club believes that as well.  David Stearns has proven himself too smart to think that Eric Sogard is a long-term option; despite his 1.257 <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.fcgi?id=sogarer01&amp;year=2017&amp;t=b#month::none">OPS in May</a>, he finished the year with an OPS of just .770.  Even this was over one hundred points higher than his career mark of .638.  Mauricio Dubon is unproven, and <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/article/34948/2018-prospects-milwaukee-brewers-top-10-prospects-lewis-brinson-monte-harrison-keston-hiura-rankings/">questions remain</a> about his bat.  The Brewers seem to love Hernan Perez, but he has a career .244 TAv, and he backslid from his seeming improvement in 2016.  That leaves Villar, who had a disappointing year and appears to have lost the club’s trust.  Even though he ended the season well (.888 OPS following the Walker trade), he could not regain his playing time, as he got only 63 plate appearances in the last 42 games of the season.  Villar was given a long rope, as no move was made to replace him until mid-August, but the rope did look as if it ran out.</p>
<p>Craig Counsell’s use of Villar in August and September suggests to me that the club does not view him as a solution at second base.  If that is the case, then an external option must be in the cards.  Because of the glacial pace of the free agent market, though, if Neil Walker is not that player, the Brewers are running out of time to find a backup.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Photo Credit: Charles LeClaire, USAToday Sports Images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/11/what-if-the-brewers-dont-sign-neil-walker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking Back at Top 10</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/03/looking-back-at-top-10/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/03/looking-back-at-top-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Lesniewski]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cody Ponce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isan Diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Hader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Brinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Erceg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the World Series has ended, the baseball offseason can officially begin. This time of year brings with it not only speculation about trades, free agents, and what a team might look like next year, but also plenty of talk about prospects. Indeed, Baseball Prospectus will begin to roll out their updated top prospects [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the World Series has ended, the baseball offseason can officially begin. This time of year brings with it not only speculation about trades, free agents, and what a team might look like next year, but also plenty of talk about prospects. Indeed, Baseball Prospectus will begin to roll out their updated top prospects lists for each MLB organization during the month of November. With that in mind, let&#8217;s take this opportunity to look back on<a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/30902/2017-prospects-milwaukee-brewers-top-10-prospects/" target="_blank"> last year&#8217;s top-10 prospect list</a> for our own Milwaukee Brewers. Non-linear prospect development is oft-discussed on these pages, so whose stock is up, whose is down, and who held steady during 2017?</p>
<p><strong>The Graduate</strong></p>
<p>2. LHP Josh Hader</p>
<p>Hader was ranked as the Brewers&#8217; #2 prospect entering the 2017 season, and he did not disappoint during his first taste of big league action. The lefty spent the first few months of the season struggling in the hitter-friendly Pacific Coast League, but once the projected Super Two cutoff had comfortably passed the Brewers brought Hader up to join a struggling bullpen. He was a revelation in a true fireman role, tossing 47.7 innings of 2.08 ERA baseball covering 35 appearances. He struck out batters in bunches, registering 12.8 K/9, while holding opponents to a .204 TAv. If ERA isn&#8217;t enough to illustrate his dominance, he also recorded an 86 cFIP and 80 DRA-. Inconsistent command and secondaries call into question whether or not Hader can eventually become a starter, but he looks to at least have fulfilled his floor of impact reliever.</p>
<p><strong>Bull Market</strong></p>
<p>1. OF Lewis Brinson</p>
<p>The 23 year old outfielder was Milwaukee&#8217;s #1 prospect last year, and there&#8217;s little doubt that the title will be bestowed upon him once again heading into 2018. In his first extended run at the minors highest level, Brinson pounded opposing pitchers to the tune of a .331/.400/.562 slash with 13 home runs and 11 steals in 76 games. He struggled in his brief MLB debut and suffered (yet another) injury in August that ended his season early, but those issues should do little to dim his long-term outlook.</p>
<p>6. OF Brett Phillips</p>
<p>Like Brinson, Maverick Phillips got his first extended taste of the AAA level in 2017 and thrived. A year after grappling with Southern League pitching, Phillips torched the PCL for a .305/.377/.567 batting line with 19 long balls and 10 steals. Unlike Brinson, Phillips opened up some eyes within the organization during an outstanding September in the big leagues, and ended 2017 with an MLB slash of four big league dingers, five steals, a .293 TAv, and some stellar defensive play in center field (+4.4 FRAA). He&#8217;s still got a lot of swing-and-miss in his game, but that&#8217;s becoming more and more prevalent throughout the league. Phillips appears to be on the inside track for the center field job in Milwaukee next spring.</p>
<p><strong>Holding Steady</strong></p>
<p>8. 3B Lucas Erceg</p>
<p>Erceg got off to a slow start in a tough league for hitters down in Carolina, but came on strong once summer officially hit. His .256/.307/.417 slash doesn&#8217;t jump off the page, but he did post an .807 OPS after June 1st and only four batters in the Carolina League slugged more than his 15 home runs. Erceg doesn&#8217;t look like he&#8217;ll be more than an average hitter who doesn&#8217;t walk much, but the power could be above-average to plus and <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/2017-carolina-league-best-tools/#1MPFYzt4gt0dSRa3.97" target="_blank">Baseball America</a> ranked his as both the top defensive third baseman and the top infield arm in the Carolina League this season.</p>
<p>9. SS/2B Mauricio Dubon</p>
<p>Dubon split the year between AA and AAA and displayed quality bat-to-ball skills and nifty defensive ability at both second base and shortstop. He didn&#8217;t brandish the power that he showed during his AA stint in Boston&#8217;s organization in 2016, though, but not many people really expected him to. Dubon&#8217;s game is built around high contact and speed, and he could contribute at the big league level as soon as this coming season.</p>
<p>10. RHP Cody Ponce</p>
<p>Ponce stayed healthy in 2017, which was one of the more worrisome issues regarding his development previously. He fills the zone and doesn&#8217;t walk many hitters, but his velocity hasn&#8217;t been quite what it was during his college days. His stuff is inconsistent at times and he didn&#8217;t miss a ton of bats this year, registering only 6.7 K/9. But he did throw nearly 140 innings in 2017 between high-A and AA while logging a 3.14 ERA, helping make his projection as a inning-eating back end starter that much more realistic.</p>
<p><strong>Bear Market</strong></p>
<p>3. OF Corey Ray</p>
<p>Ray&#8217;s been a pretty big disappointment in the early stages of his career since Milwaukee popped him fifth overall in 2016. He&#8217;s struggled adjusting to even average fastball velocity, and was overmatched to the tune of a league-leading 156 strikeouts in 112 games (31 percent K-rate) with Carolina this past season. He&#8217;s become a well-regarded defender in center field and has speed to burn, but after batting .238/.311/.367 with 7 homers this season, he&#8217;s started getting some grades as a future fourth outfielder.</p>
<p>4. 2B/SS Isan Diaz</p>
<p>Diaz has been lauded as one of the top-hitting middle infield prospects in the game, but that didn&#8217;t really come to fruition in 2017. His power was way down as he clubbed 13 home runs in Carolina (from 20 the year before in low-A) and saw a 50+ point drop in his ISO. He also had issues with expanding his strike zone and whiffed in nearly 27 percent of his plate appearances. Given that he&#8217;s unlikely to stick at shortstop with his limited range, there&#8217;s a lot of pressure on his bat to develop. A .222/.334/.376 slash in A-ball isn&#8217;t going to cut it.</p>
<p>5. RHP Luis Ortiz</p>
<p>Ortiz spent the entire year in AA at the age of 21 in 2017 and finished with a respectable 4.01 ERA in 94.3 innings, which was a career-high. But he missed time once again with injury, which is concerning given his reputation for poor conditioning and a &#8220;bad body.&#8221; For as much talk as there&#8217;s been about his advanced stuff, he didn&#8217;t get a lot of whiffs against his Southern League competition, registering 7.5 K/9, while also issuing a career-worst 3.5 BB/9. While there&#8217;s still hope for an above-average starter, he&#8217;s behind the eight-ball when it comes to building an innings base and needs to show that he&#8217;s capable of handling a full-season&#8217;s workload.</p>
<p>7. OF Trent Clark</p>
<p>Another Ray Montgomery 1st-rounder that has so far failed to live up to expectations. Clark was considered the most advanced high school bat in the 2015 class, but so far in the professional ranks he&#8217;s been dinged for being far too passive in the strike zone. His reserved approach helps him get on base at a high clip and draw plenty of walks against low-level pitching, but that won&#8217;t be sustainable as he climbs the minor league ladder. He has yet to find any semblance of consistent power, either, as his OBP (.360) was higher than his SLG (.348) in 2017. This purportedly &#8220;advanced hitter&#8221; could manage only a .223 average in 2017 while striking out at a 24 percent clip. His limited arm strength means that left field is probably the best fit long-term, putting even ore pressure on the bat to start developing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/03/looking-back-at-top-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Considering the Keystone</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/09/12/considering-the-keystone/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/09/12/considering-the-keystone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Nofz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2017 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2017 Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Sogard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hernan Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isan Diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Villar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keston Hiura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Orf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scooter Gennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yadiel Rivera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heading into the 2017 season, few Brewers fans were worried about second base. Jonathan Villar had spent the previous summer making good on his potential, authoring a 4.7 WARP season along the way. Scooter Gennett and Yadiel Rivera provided a decent insurance policy: one could be relied on for some decent at bats, while the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heading into the 2017 season, few Brewers fans were worried about second base. Jonathan Villar had spent the previous summer making good on his potential, authoring a 4.7 WARP season along the way. Scooter Gennett and Yadiel Rivera provided a decent insurance policy: one could be relied on for some decent at bats, while the other could field screaming grounders in his sleep. In all, a respectable trio of keystone contributors.</p>
<p>That narrative started to change on March 28, when the Cincinnati Reds claimed Gennett off waivers. The loss barely registered on most fans’ radars. A blip of nostalgia, perhaps, but these were the rebuilding Milwaukee Brewers. We’re used to players coming and going. In actuality, Gennett’s sudden departure was the first in a series of unexpected events that engulfed second basemen throughout the Brewers’ system. (Perhaps the most unexpected? Scooter’s .308 Total Average (TAv) and 24 dingers in 435 plate appearances for the division-rival Reds.)</p>
<p>As 2017 winds down, it’s safe to say that the second base picture has grown considerably more murky. Here’s a brief overview of the state of the position up and down the organization.</p>
<p><strong>Major Leagues</strong><br />
<strong>Jonathan Villar </strong>got off to a miserable start this season, hitting only .221 before the All-Star break and battling a lower back injury in June. Even before the injury, ineffectiveness cost Villar significant playing time. The Brewers summoned utility infielder <strong>Eric Sogard</strong> from Class-AAA in mid-May, and the diminutive veteran’s hot start in Milwaukee left Villar the odd man out. It was scarcely the follow-up the club had hoped for from Villar, who led the majors with 62 stolen bases and recorded a .826 OPS last year. Villar earned his long leash, but he deserved his reduced role this summer. He’s provided fans a glimmer of hope since the break, batting .288/.306/.415 while working at second and dabbling in center field.</p>
<p><strong>Sogard</strong>, meanwhile, won hearts across Brewers nation with a monstrous first half, in which he batted .331/.438/.485. He, too, was bit by the injury bug this season, landing on the 10-day disabled list with a left ankle strain in early July. He hasn’t been the same player since making his way back to the active roster, as evidenced by a paltry .171/.276/.224 triple-slash in the second half. The 31-year-old is a free agent at the end of the season, meaning his days in Milwaukee blue may be numbered.</p>
<p>The versatile <strong>Hernan Perez </strong>has occasionally spelled Sogard and Villar this year, and he’s done so with aplomb. Brewers brass prefers Perez in a super-utility role, though, so he shouldn’t be considered a long-term solution at the keystone. The same goes for <strong>Yadiel Rivera</strong>, who made only one brief trip to the majors in his final option year, going hitless in a pair of plate appearances.</p>
<p>Dissatisfied with a slumping Sogard and inconsistent Villar, the Brewers acquired <strong>Neil Walker </strong>from the New York Mets on August 12 for a player to be named. Walker has been a steady contributor this year, amassing 1.3 WARP in just 380 plate appearances. He’s turned it up a notch since coming to Milwaukee, batting .279/.395/.485 in 22 games. But the 31-year-old is likely to command more in free agency this offseason than the Brewers will want to pay. With younger options already on the big league roster, Walker is likely a pure rental, to be enjoyed while he lasts.</p>
<p><strong>Minor Leagues</strong><br />
Eric Sogard’s May promotion to the major leagues allowed <strong>Nate Orf</strong> to lock down the second base job in Class-AAA Colorado Springs. He hasn’t disappointed. Orf hit .320/.397/.507 in the thin air of the Pacific Coast League, flashing hitherto unseen power (his 9 home runs this year surpassed his previous career total). At 27 years old, Orf is an unconventional prospect. But he’s also an intriguing one. Orf draws plenty of walks (10.7 percent), and his solid hit tool allows him to avoid strikeouts (14.8 percent). He’s managed to keep the ball off the ground this year, too, and could be a sneaky-good major leaguer if ever given the chance. His .288 TAv in Colorado Springs indicates that he’s ready for that opportunity. Orf could crack the Opening Day roster as a utility man next year if he’s protected from the Rule 5 Draft this offseason.</p>
<p><strong>Mauricio Dubon </strong>split time between second base and shortstop this year, reaching Colorado Springs for the first time on June 26. Dubon possesses a solid hit tool, but he failed to replicate the power he flashed last season with the Portland Sea Dogs. If he grows into some pop, he could be a nifty starter. Otherwise, he’s destined for a role as a utility player.</p>
<p><strong>Isan Diaz </strong>came to Milwaukee in the Jean Segura trade, and won the organizational Minor League Player of the Year award in 2016 by way of a first impression. He socked 20 home runs and 34 doubles in the Midwest League last season, but took a step back in Class-Advanced A Carolina this year. Diaz struck out in 26.6 percent of his plate appearances en route to a .222/.334/.376 line for the Mudcats. A fractured hamate ended his season in late August.</p>
<p>With the ninth selection of the Rule 4 Draft, the Brewers nabbed California-Irvine standout <strong>Keston Hiura</strong>. Hiura’s a second baseman by trade, but acted as a strict DH throughout his final collegiate season amidst concerns over an injured elbow. Any worries about whether he could field were mitigated by the fact that Hiura can really, <em>really</em> hit. He walloped Arizona League pitching with a .425 TAv before moving up to Class-A Wisconsin and posting a .326 TAv in just over 100 plate appearances. Hiura returned to the dirt towards the end of the season and held his own at second base. He will push Diaz for superiority in the top prospect pecking order when he gets his first taste of the Carolina League next season.</p>
<p><strong>2018 Outlook</strong><br />
Barring any significant off-season moves, Jonathan Villar is again the odds-on favorite to start at second on Opening Day. Should he stumble out of the gate, he could cede some playing time to Nate Orf, or to a random free agent signing. Mauricio Dubon could likely benefit from another year of AAA pitching, while the high-upside duo of Diaz and Hiura are set to slug it out for a promotion to Biloxi. Keep an eye on Dubon’s ISO, Diaz’s strikeout percentage, and Hiura’s work with the glove. Villar will reach free agency after the 2020 campaign. By this time next year, we should have a pretty good idea of his heir apparent.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Photo Credit: Benny Sieu, USAToday Sports Images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/09/12/considering-the-keystone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Cashing Out OFP 2</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/06/08/update-cashing-out-ofp-2/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/06/08/update-cashing-out-ofp-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Zettel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2017 Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers trade analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domingo Santana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francisco Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Nottingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Jeffress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jett Bandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Lucroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Villar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Hader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Pennington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junior Guerra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keon Broxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khris Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Fiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Thornburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yusion Coca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Davies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=9145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I examined the surplus added by Brewers GM David Stearns, which is undoubtedly one of the reasons the club is performing quite well. Stearns, in stark contrast to recently famous rebuilds in Chicago and his previous front office (Houston), is building competitive clubs at the MLB level by cashing in on short-term [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, I examined the surplus added by Brewers GM David Stearns, which is undoubtedly one of the reasons the club is performing quite well. Stearns, in stark contrast to recently famous rebuilds in Chicago and his previous front office (Houston), is building competitive clubs at the MLB level by cashing in on short-term value trades that return production in surprising places. Jonathan Villar , for all his shortcomings in 2017, remains the poster boy for this type of trade (yes, he&#8217;s still one of the most valuable players in the organization), but others remain: Keon Broxton and Jett Bandy came out of nowhere, as did Junior Guerra and Manny Pina, among others. Following this line, and celebrating the completion of the Tyler Thornburg trade with the Player To Be Named Later arriving, I am returning to the Brewers&#8217; trade surplus to see how trades are progressing across the organization.</p>
<p>Related Reading:<br />
<a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/06/04/surplus-scalp-or-spread/">Scalp / Spread Strategies</a><br />
<a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/06/01/bandy-maldonado-or-win-win/">Bandy-Maldonado</a></p>
<p>Here, following the offseason treatment, I am including major deals from July 2015 (the arguable start of &#8220;Rebuilding&#8221;) through the present day, meaning that these moves are not entirely Stearns&#8217;s trades. Indeed, the Zach Davies / Gerardo Parra trade and the Carlos Gomez &amp; Mike Fiers return remain two reasons that the Brewers did not need to &#8220;tank&#8221; and design a &#8220;scorched earth&#8221; rebuild that completely reconstructed the organization. Coupled with draft signings by the late Bruce Seid (such as Jacob Barnes and [soon] Brandon Woodruff), as well as graduated top prospects like Orlando Arcia, and superstar Ryan Braun, the &#8220;rebuilding&#8221; Brewers have remained competitive due to several different talent streams entering, remaining, and graduating through the system.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><strong>Trade Surplus Depreciated WARP &amp; OFP Summary:</strong></em></p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">Trades</th>
<th align="center">DayOf</th>
<th align="center">16-17Offseason</th>
<th align="center">Current</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2015July</td>
<td align="center">$77.0M</td>
<td align="center">$107.4M</td>
<td align="center">$117.9M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">1516Offseason</td>
<td align="center">$129.5M</td>
<td align="center">$182.4M</td>
<td align="center">$183.5M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">2016July</td>
<td align="center">$109.5M</td>
<td align="center">$123.1M</td>
<td align="center">$116.4M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">1617Offseason</td>
<td align="center">$32.7M</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">$54.4M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Total</td>
<td align="center">$348.7M</td>
<td align="center">$445.6M</td>
<td align="center">$472.2M</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As a reminder, I will be following the <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/05/translating-ofp/">historical model of Overall Future Potential</a> (OFP) production drawn from the history of MLB performances. Scaled for prospect risk, here&#8217;s how those prospect levels can be valuated, with 50 OFP being an &#8220;average&#8221; MLB player:</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">OFP</th>
<th align="center">Value</th>
<th align="center">Percentile</th>
<th align="center">Depreciated Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">40 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$0.5M</td>
<td align="center">7th to 8th</td>
<td align="center">$0.1M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">45 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$7.0M</td>
<td align="center">66th</td>
<td align="center">$1.4M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">50 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$97.3M</td>
<td align="center">88th to 91st</td>
<td align="center">$19.5M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">55 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$170.8M</td>
<td align="center">Approx. 94th</td>
<td align="center">$34.2M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">60 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$244.3M</td>
<td align="center">97th to 98th</td>
<td align="center">$48.9M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">65 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$359.8M</td>
<td align="center">99th</td>
<td align="center">$72.0M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">70-75 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$499.8M</td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center">$100.0M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">80 OFP</td>
<td align="center">$845.6M</td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center">$169.1M</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/01/cashing-out-ofp/">Last check-in</a>, here&#8217;s how the Brewers&#8217; trades looked. Given Zach Davies&#8217;s quick ascent to the MLB, I forgot to add him in this list, so his trade will be featured below.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">What Happened? (Traded)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus</th>
<th align="center">What Happened? (Received)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus</th>
<th align="center">Balance</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Sneed to 45</td>
<td align="center">$1.4M</td>
<td align="center">J. Villar 4.8 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$78.1M</td>
<td align="center">+$76.7M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Lucroy &amp; Jeffress 2017 / J. Lucroy &amp; J. Jeffress 1.3 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$63.2M</td>
<td align="center">Brinson to 55-70 OFP / Ortiz &amp; Cordell no change</td>
<td align="center">$114.1M</td>
<td align="center">+$50.9M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Fiers 2017 / C. Gomez &amp; M. Fiers 0.1 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$23.2M</td>
<td align="center">Santana 0.9 WARP / Hader to 55-60 / Phillips 45-55 / Houser 40</td>
<td align="center">$73.8M</td>
<td align="center">+$50.6M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">J. Rogers DFA / J. Rogers -0.2 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$0.5M</td>
<td align="center">K. Broxton 1.4 WARP / Supak no change</td>
<td align="center">$21.2M</td>
<td align="center">+$20.7M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">J. Segura &amp; T. Wagner 6.3 WARP / Segura trade &amp; T. Wagner lost (-$3.2M)</td>
<td align="center">$40.9</td>
<td align="center">C. Anderson &amp; A. Hill 1.2 WARP / I. Diaz to 60 OFP solid / A. Hill trade (-$1.5M)</td>
<td align="center">$55.8M</td>
<td align="center">+$14.9M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Lind -0.8 WARP</td>
<td align="center">-$7.5M</td>
<td align="center">No change (yet!)</td>
<td align="center">$2.9M</td>
<td align="center">+$10.4M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">F. Rodriguez 2017 / F. Rodriguez 1.1 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$13.0M</td>
<td align="center">Pina 0.1 WARP / Pina to 45 / Betancourt no change</td>
<td align="center">$3.5M</td>
<td align="center">-$9.5M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">J. Broxton 2017 / J. Broxton 1.1 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$10.2M</td>
<td align="center">M. Collymore no change</td>
<td align="center">$0.8M</td>
<td align="center">-$11.0M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">W. Smith 2017 / W. Smith 0.4 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$22.0M</td>
<td align="center">Susac 0.0 WARP / Bickford no change</td>
<td align="center">$9.0M</td>
<td align="center">-$13.0M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">K. Davis 2017 / K. Davis 2.3 WARP</td>
<td align="center">$47.0M</td>
<td align="center">J. Nottingham to 50 OFP / B. Derby no change</td>
<td align="center">$20.9M</td>
<td align="center">-$26.1M</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Following this set of deals, it should be interesting to note that while the Brewers system prospects have had ups and downs, the players traded away have exhibited true depreciation within one year. This should demonstrate one benefit of using a depreciation model to assess future player value, which is the model I have been working with throughout the offseason; players <em>do</em> depreciate in terms of production. Jonathan Lucroy, Jeremy Jeffress, Gerardo Parra, Carlos Gomez, Mike Fiers, Adam Lind, and Jason Rogers all demonstrate this, and it should be noted they demonstrate this without completely crashing their value in the meantime (especially in the case of Lucroy). Khris Davis is perhaps the worst counterexample, as Stearns almost certainly sold low on the slugger, who also deserves credit for making adjustments and shifting his approach in Oakland.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">What Happened? (Traded)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">What Happened? (Received)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">Balance ($M)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Lucroy &amp; Jeffress 0.2 WARP /Lucroy 2017 &amp; Jeffress 2Arb</td>
<td align="center">26.6</td>
<td align="center">Brinson / Ortiz / Cordell no change</td>
<td align="center">114.1</td>
<td align="center">87.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Gomez &amp; Fiers -0.9 WARP / Fiers 2018-2019</td>
<td align="center">4.1</td>
<td align="center">Santana 2.4 WARP / Hader &amp; Phillips &amp; Houser no change</td>
<td align="center">89.2</td>
<td align="center">85.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Sneed no change</td>
<td align="center">1.4</td>
<td align="center">J. Villar 4.8 WARP</td>
<td align="center">70.3</td>
<td align="center">68.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">G. Parra no change</td>
<td align="center">-6.0</td>
<td align="center">Z. Davies 2.4 WARP</td>
<td align="center">28.6</td>
<td align="center">34.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Rogers no change</td>
<td align="center">-0.5</td>
<td align="center">Broxton 1.8 WARP / Supak no change</td>
<td align="center">29.3</td>
<td align="center">28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Segura &amp; Wagner 6.3 WARP / Segura trade &amp; Wagner lost (-$3.2M)</td>
<td align="center">40.9</td>
<td align="center">C. Anderson / I. Diaz / A. Hill no change</td>
<td align="center">55.8</td>
<td align="center">14.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">F. Rodriguez 0.9 WARP</td>
<td align="center">5.2</td>
<td align="center">Pina 1.1 WARP / Betancourt no change</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center">11.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Lind -0.8 WARP / free agent</td>
<td align="center">-7.5</td>
<td align="center">Peralta / Herrera / Missaki no change</td>
<td align="center">2.9</td>
<td align="center">10.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">J. Broxton 2017 / Broxton 1.1 WARP</td>
<td align="center">3.7</td>
<td align="center">M. Collymore released</td>
<td align="center">-0.8</td>
<td align="center">-4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">W. Smith no change</td>
<td align="center">22.0</td>
<td align="center">Susac to 45 OFP / Bickford 40-45</td>
<td align="center">2.3</td>
<td align="center">-19.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">K. Davis 3.3 WARP / 2Arb Control</td>
<td align="center">53.0</td>
<td align="center">J. Nottingham to 40-50 OFP / B. Derby no change</td>
<td align="center">8.5</td>
<td align="center">-44.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A few quick notes:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Lucroy-Jeffress and Gomez-Fiers deals shifted value for completely different reasons. The former relies fully (thus far) on problematic performances by the players the Brewers traded away, while the latter is improving in value both due to struggles by Gomez and Fiers <em>and</em> improvements by Domingo Santana. The Gomez-Fiers deal remains one of the strongest deals to build the Brewers system, even with Josh Hader&#8217;s recent struggles, and Brett Phillips&#8217;s graduation solidifies <em>at least</em> the 45 OFP grade (which is not nothing), while the ceiling remains to be seen.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Hidden in the middle of this table is the Francisco Rodriguez trade, which was one of Stearns&#8217;s worst trades on the day it occurred. But thankfully, trades are not solely graded on the day-of, and post hoc analysis loves Manny Pina&#8217;s development into (at least) a split time catcher at the MLB level. K-Rod has not been terrible, for what it&#8217;s worth, but when that contract winds down to its last year the surplus value really depends on short-term production rather than longterm outlook. This hurts the K-Rod score as much as it hurts Lucroy&#8217;s assessment in Texas.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Let it be stated that the Khris Davis trade return was <em>solid</em> (if not spectacular) on the day-of. But it&#8217;s great to be reminded that prospect stock can depreciate, too. Fortunately, scouting reports suggest that Jacob Nottingham can remain behind the plate, answering one previous question. But if that power (and bat) does not come around, it may not matter as much; it is getting more appropriate to highlight, say, the 40-45 end of Nottingham&#8217;s grade (still means he reaches the MLB) than the 55 end that helped him reach Oakland&#8217;s Top 10. Of course, remember that Manny Pina was probably a 40-45 grade minor leaguer when Milwaukee acquired him, so&#8230;you know the rest.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I believe there could be some reason to reassess prospects like Freddy Peralta or Ryan Cordell, who I would rate as valuable depth options for the system. However, for the purposes of this exercise, there is not necessarily enough non-statistical information to fully develop a new scouting grade. So perhaps a few prospects in this table deserve an asterisk next to their grade.</li>
</ul>
<p>Turning from the &#8220;earlier&#8221; trades to the 2017 offseason, one can see how Stearns developed the surprising 2017 contender. It is interesting to note that for the offseason coverage of the club, so many of us (myself included) completely failed to properly price the GM&#8217;s immediate value for these trades.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">What Happened? (Traded)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">What Happened? (Received)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">Balance ($M)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">T. Thornburg</td>
<td align="center">3.4</td>
<td align="center">T. Shaw / M. Dubon (45-50 OFP) / Pennington / cash or PTBNL</td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">23.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">M. Maldonado / D. Gagnon</td>
<td align="center">9.6</td>
<td align="center">J. Bandy</td>
<td align="center">5.7</td>
<td align="center">-3.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For example, Mauricio Dubon was never (and probably will not be) the prime value of the Thornburg deal. What makes the Thornburg deal so amazing is that, given Thornburg&#8217;s career development, a straight-up Dubon-for-Thornburg deal would have been solid. Yet, Stearns did not stop there; the GM managed to return not just Dubon, but also a legitimate MLB asset in Travis Shaw, as well as two total lottery tickets (exemplified in Yusion Coca, the Player-To-Be-Named-Later who completed this deal). This trade should continue to &#8220;give&#8221; to the organization, whether it is in the form of Josh Pennington or Coco being included in a future trade (they are sufficiently far from the MLB to be traded once more), or Dubon working in a utility role or second-tier MLB starting role.</p>
<table border="" width="" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#EDF1F3">
<th align="center">What Happened? (Traded)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">What Happened? (Received)</th>
<th align="center">Total Surplus ($M)</th>
<th align="center">Balance ($M)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">T. Thornburg no change</td>
<td align="center">3.4</td>
<td align="center">T. Shaw 1.4 WARP / Dubon &amp; Pennington no change / Y. Coca (40-45)</td>
<td align="center">38.1</td>
<td align="center">23.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Maldonado 1.0 WARP / Maldonado 2018 / Gagnon no change</td>
<td align="center">14.9</td>
<td align="center">J. Bandy 0.7 WARP</td>
<td align="center">16.3</td>
<td align="center">1.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>A quick word: These numbers are indeed abstract! The Brewers claim approximately $472.2 million in depreciated surplus value from these trades, which roughly translates to 67 WARP (Wins Above Replacement Player) within the system. These 67 WARP could be maximized and turned into 87 market-rate WARP, they could remain steady over time, or they could further depreciate to 49 WARP. These figures are abstract, of course, because they incorporate risk into the system, and can be cashed out any which way; if Stearns cashes out 87 WARP within the next two years, the Brewers will have quite a competitive team; if these players remain merely competitive or decline further, it will be questioned whether more trades were necessary. The players could continue to depreciate, and many could fail to reach the MLB (if they are prospects). Stearns can cash out surplus through trades or development. So these numbers should not necessarily be interpreted to apply to any timeframe; that&#8217;s up to the GM to determine.</em></p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve already focused specifically on the Jett Bandy-Martin Maldonado deal recently, I will not dive deeper into that deal except to emphasize the importance of post hoc trade analysis. Returning to a trade after the fact, with the proper tools, is not simply &#8220;using hindsight,&#8221; but rather healthy Benefit-Cost Analysis. Moreover, returning to a trade after the fact, with the proper tools, is an opportunity to potentially sharpen those analytical tools in order to provide better day-of trade analysis. But of course, the Bandy trade is not yet complete, nor are most of these deals, really. So, by returning to these trades with analytical methods over time, one can come to understand organizational value as a malleable entity that is never truly solidified at one point in time. This is arguably yet another reason to oppose &#8220;rebuilding,&#8221; or to opposing &#8220;winning now,&#8221; or any extreme organizational strategy; it is also possible to never build an organization, or to build an organization through contrarian means (as Stearns is doing). There should be no reason for an MLB club to fail to simultaneously build for the present and future, save for a lack of creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/06/08/update-cashing-out-ofp-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camp Prospects</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/10/camp-prospects/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/10/camp-prospects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Lesniewski]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus Aguilar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Hader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Brinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Erceg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paolo Espino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Cordell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Kohlscheen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=8241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each year, spring training serves as a warm up for players knock out the winter&#8217;s cobwebs and get in playing shape for the long baseball regular season. Most players are working through some sort of mechanical adjustments or tinkering with a new pitch, pitchers only work maybe a couple of innings as they build up arm [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, spring training serves as a warm up for players knock out the winter&#8217;s cobwebs and get in playing shape for the long baseball regular season. Most players are working through some sort of mechanical adjustments or <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamMcCalvy/status/839943789007347712" target="_blank">tinkering with a new pitch</a>, pitchers only work maybe a couple of innings as they build up arm strength, and games feature wholesale lineup changes halfway through as managers try and get all their guys work. Spring training at least gives us baseball to talk about, but the small sample size of game action is far too small for us to draw any sort of meaningful conclusions about a player&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p>Given the training camp nature of spring, it also allows us to catch our first glimpses of some of the top prospects littered throughout the minor league system. Split squad games and non-roster invitations allow ample opportunity for farmhands to show their wares in major league games, which have more often been televised or broadcast on the radio in recent years. Even with the massive grain of salt that should be taken based on the paragraph above, it&#8217;s difficult not to engender some enthusiasm when a prospect shows off his tools during spring games. With that said, let&#8217;s take a look at some of the Milwaukee Brewers&#8217; prospects who have shown well during the first two or so weeks of spring training game action:</p>
<p><strong>Lucas Erceg</strong><br />
Milwaukee&#8217;s 2nd-round pick in last year&#8217;s draft, Erceg isn&#8217;t officially a part of big league camp but has been loaned from the minor league side several times and seen plenty of game action. In six games thus far he&#8217;s taken 11 at-bats while working a 1.500 OPS. He&#8217;s slugged two balls over the fence already and driven in seven while showing off his rocket arm at third base. <a href="https://twitter.com/BaseballAmerica/status/839067075867979776">Check out where this ball lands</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Jesus Aguilar</strong><br />
While he&#8217;s no longer <em>technically </em>a prospect, Aguilar has only 64 MLB plate appearances on his ledger in parts of three seasons and has yet to establish himself in the big leagues. The Brewers claimed the hulking first baseman off waivers in early February to give him a shot at earning a spot on the bench as a right handed power hitter and backup to lefty Eric Thames. Given his lack of positional versatility, the out-of-options Aguilar needed his bat to do some serious talking if he&#8217;s going to make the team out of camp. So far, so good, as Aguilar has scorched opposing pitchers to the tune of a .474/.524/.842 slash in 19 at-bats with two home runs. You can read more about his profile <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/02/replacing-chris-carter/" target="_blank">in this BPMilwaukee feature by Dylan Svoboda</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Ryan Cordell</strong><br />
The subject of one of <a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/09/player-to-be-named-now/" target="_blank">yesterday&#8217;s features</a> on BP Milwaukee, the PTBNL from the Jonathan Lucroy trade is making a strong impression during his first camp with Milwaukee. He&#8217;s already appeared in 10 games and in 15 at-bats has posted a 1.279 OPS while showing power (one homer), patience (six walks), and versatility in the outfield. He&#8217;ll likely begin the season in AAA, but <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamMcCalvy/status/839617865368023040">Cordell has already earned praise from the big league manager</a>.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ryan Cordell is making an impression. CC: &quot;He’s probably a little farther along than I expected, closer to the big leagues than I expected.&quot;</p>
<p>&mdash; Adam McCalvy (@AdamMcCalvy) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamMcCalvy/status/839617865368023040">March 8, 2017</a></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Lewis Brinson</strong><br />
Ranked as Milwaukee&#8217;s <a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=30902" target="_blank">#1 overall prospect</a>, expectations are high for the 22 year old center fielder. He&#8217;s looked solid so far this spring playing center field while batting .273/.333/.455 across 22 at-bats. He&#8217;s stolen a base and shown off some <a href="http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/69972428/v1233228583/milcws-brinsons-solo-home-run-ties-game-in-the-3rd/" target="_blank">impressive opposite-field power</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Mauricio Dubon</strong><br />
The 22 year old shortstop isn&#8217;t quite as polished as the other players we&#8217;ve discussed so far, as he just reached AA for the first time last year for a 62 game stint. After getting dealt to the Brewers over the winter, he&#8217;ll return to that level to start the 2017 season with Biloxi. Dubon has been a bit over-matched at the plate, collecting only two hits in 11 at-bats while striking out three times, but he&#8217;s flashed impressive leather already on several occasions while manning the shortstop position. <a href="https://twitter.com/Brewers/status/839956732235415556">Here&#8217;s his incredible play from yesterday&#8217;s game against the Padres</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Josh Hader</strong><br />
Even though he&#8217;s ranked by <a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=30902">BaseballProspectus as the best Brewers pitching prospect</a>, there are still questions about whether Hader will be able to remain as a starter long-term. To answer those doubts, he&#8217;s working diligently to master his <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamMcCalvy/status/839902358532341761" target="_blank">&#8220;messed-up circle change&#8221;</a> grip to give him a third offering along with his dominant fastball/slider combination. Thus far during the spring, Hader has been working in the 92-96 MPH range and touched 97 (per <a href="http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=623352&amp;b_hand=-1&amp;gFilt=&amp;pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&amp;time=month&amp;minmax=mm&amp;var=mph&amp;s_type=2&amp;startDate=01/01/2017&amp;endDate=01/01/2018" target="_blank">Brooks Baseball</a>) while allowing just one earned run in 4.7 innings with a 5:2 K/BB ratio.</p>
<p><strong>Paolo Espino</strong><br />
Despite possessing a rather strong minor league track record (3.63 ERA, 7.8 K/9, 1.9 BB/9 in 426.7 innings at AAA), the 30 year old Espino has never gotten a shot at the big leagues while previously with the Indians and Nationals organizations. Espino is in camp as a non-roster invitee and is likely ticketed for the Sky Sox rotation to begin the year, but he&#8217;s been impressive during his couple of looks this spring. He&#8217;s <a href="http://www.brooksbaseball.net/tabs.php?player=502179&amp;time=month&amp;startDate=01/01/2017&amp;endDate=01/01/2018&amp;s_type=2" target="_blank">brandishing a five pitch mix</a> (rising four seamer, sinker, changeup, slider, and curveball), sitting 88-92 MPH with his hard stuff and has yet to allow a run through a team-high 6.0 innings. He&#8217;s allowed just one hit, walked two and has whiffed four opposing batters. Perhaps he&#8217;s a candidate to become this year&#8217;s version of #2016BrewersAce Junior Guerra.</p>
<p><strong>Stephen Kohlscheen</strong><br />
A former 45th-round pick by the Mariners (2010) who has previously spent time in Seattle&#8217;s and San Diego&#8217;s farm systems, Kohlscheen joined the Brewers on a minor league deal last year and was lights-out at AA Biloxi&#8217;s closer, posting a 2.54 ERA and 67:17 K/BB ratio with 23 saves across 49.7 innings pitched. His 12.1 K/9 last season was tops among Brewer farmhands (minimum 40 IP) and helped him earn another minor league deal with Milwaukee for 2017 that included an invite to big league camp. Thus far Kohlscheen has worked two scoreless appearances spanning 3.3 innings that have included just one hit allowed, no walks, and three punch-outs. He&#8217;s <a href="http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=518898&amp;b_hand=-1&amp;gFilt=&amp;pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&amp;time=month&amp;minmax=mm&amp;var=mph&amp;s_type=2&amp;startDate=01/01/2017&amp;endDate=01/01/2018" target="_blank">been throwing</a> a rising fastball in the 92-94 MPH range along with a hard slider that sits 85-88 MPH. The 28 year old has never appeared in the big leagues, but given the Brewers wide-open bullpen situation, if he doesn&#8217;t break camp with the big league club he stands out as a candidate to receive a call-up at some point during the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/10/camp-prospects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mauricio Dubon: Letting the Game Come</title>
		<link>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/02/16/mauricio-dubon/</link>
		<comments>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/02/16/mauricio-dubon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Conness]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2017 Brewers top prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers prospect analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewers top prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=8037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 6, 2016, the Milwaukee Brewers and Boston Red Sox struck a deal that sent then-Brewers reliever Tyler Thornburg to the Red Sox for third baseman Travis Shaw and minor leaguers Josh Pennington, Mauricio Dubon, and a PTBNL or cash. Shaw was the headliner in the package the Brewers received, but Dubon was arguably [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 6, 2016, the Milwaukee Brewers and Boston Red Sox struck a deal that sent then-Brewers reliever Tyler Thornburg to the Red Sox for third baseman Travis Shaw and minor leaguers Josh Pennington, Mauricio Dubon, and a PTBNL or cash. Shaw was the headliner in the package the Brewers received, but Dubon was arguably the most exciting piece in the deal. The 22-year-old shortstop had moved quickly up in the Red Sox organization after being drafted in the 26<sup>th</sup> round back in 2013. Prior to the start of the 2016 season, MLB.com ranked him 12<sup>th</sup> in the Red Sox organization.</p>
<p>Dubon committed to the Red Sox after high school and began his career in rookie ball in 2013. Dubon was not your normal high school baseball player, however. Just four years earlier, he left his home in Honduras to pursue his dreams of playing Major League Baseball. “It was tough at the time because I had to leave my mom, my dad, and my brother. It was tough. I was far away from them. But in the long run I knew it was going to pay off, because nothing good comes easy.”</p>
<p>In 2014, following a brief 20 games in rookie ball the year prior, Dubon played in 66 games with the Single-A Lowell Spinners, where he slashed .320/.337/.395. He only had eight doubles and three home runs, while being caught on the base paths more than half of the time (7-for-15). Even though he finished second in the New York-Penn League in hitting, there was a lot left to be desired when it came to other aspects of his game. He was fifth in the league in errors and only finished in the middle of the pack in slugging percentage due to his high batting average.</p>
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cNGvY6AAcPM" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe>
<p>Dubon did see improvements come 2015. While moving up to full and advanced-A ball, the Honduran infielder added to his on-base and stolen base numbers. His average did drop down to .288 in 120 games, but his on-base percentage jumped 12 points to .349. His walk rate went from 3.3percent in 2014 to 7.7 percent in 2015. As for the stolen bases, Dubon was successful 30 of 37 times. However, the six-foot and 160-pound shortstop saw zero improvements when it came to power, as his slugging percentage actually dipped down to .376.</p>
<p>The start of 2016 was not much different either. Dubon began the season where he ended the season prior, with the advanced-A Salem Red Sox. He played in 62 games with them, hitting .306/.387/.379 with zero home runs and 24 stolen bases. It seemed as if we already knew who Dubon was and the player he was going to be: a quick, slap-hitter, who reached base with his legs. Not a whole lot more than that.</p>
<p>His hitting success led to a promotion midseason, this time to the Class-AA Portland Sea Dogs. And all of the sudden, Dubon became a power hitter.</p>
<p>“Swing-wise, it has always been the same. It was just, [Portland’s manager] and I talked about a few things. When I am in a favorable count, don’t be afraid to swing hard. If you swing and miss, you are still in a good position. When I was in Salem, the ballpark is very big and the hitting conditions are not that good. So, I was just satisfied with making contact and getting base hits, instead of driving the baseball. When I got to Portland, I made the adjustment of swinging &#8211; not out of my shoes. But when I had a favorable count &#8211; 0-0, 2-0, 3-1, I made sure to make a good swing and make solid contact.”</p>
<p>That advice from manager Carlos Febles certainly paid off. In the 62 games he was a member of the Sea Dogs, Dubon hit 20 doubles, six triples, and six home runs. In his previous 186 games, he had 29 doubles, four triples, and eight home runs. Not only did his power spike, he hit .339 to go along with his newfound .538 slugging percentage. “I let the game come to me. I was not trying to look for something. I have been trying to get stronger and hit the ball harder. There are more opportunities to get base hits, get on base, and score runs.”</p>
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cFl6QkdGZ_g" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe>
<p>I was surprised to hear that Dubon did not change much in his swing to garner these results. Typically, a change this drastic in production comes from a major adjustment in a player’s swing. With the right-handed hitter, all he needed was a different approach and mentality at the plate. I followed up my asking him whether or not his game plan was to become more aggressive and to take advantage of a hitter’s pitch.</p>
<p>“Yes. I was looking for something elevated. It was not something out of this world that I was trying to do. It was more just trying to hit the ball hard. I wasn’t trying to hit home runs at all. I was just trying to do more damage at the plate.”</p>
<p>Even before the sudden spurt of power in Portland, Dubon had reduced his ground ball rate each and every year. In 2014, over 60 percent of his balls in play were hit on the ground. The next season, that number dropped to 56 percent. But in his most successful year, the 2016 season, that number came all the way down to 47 percent. That is a significant improvement. As you can imagine, his fly ball percentage climbed every year as well. And most importantly, he started to drive the ball to all parts of the field and into the gaps.</p>
<p><a href="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2017/02/Dubon-Heat-Map.gif"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8058" src="http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2017/02/Dubon-Heat-Map.gif" alt="Dubon Heat Map" width="430" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Courtesy of MLBfarm.com, this visual shows Dubon’s much-improved batted balls profile. His spray chart in 2014 is pretty ugly, as most of his balls were hit in the infield. You can see improvements in 2015, with more batted balls to the outfield. However in 2016, the former Red Sox prospect utilized all parts of the field and hit the ball much deeper more often. If only there was data on minor league exit velocity and launch angle (sigh).</p>
<p>Dubon has not changed much this offseason and continues to put in the work. He begins his days at 10 AM with a two-hour workout, followed by a lunch break. Then at 2 PM, he will hit for roughly four hours, wrapping up with some drills at shortstop. Routine is something the 22-year-old enjoys, and it has allowed for him to improve on every aspect of his game this winter.</p>
<p>“There is always something to improve on. I wish I could run faster. I wish I could hit the ball harder. I wish I could field the ball better. Right now, I am preparing myself to get to that player I want to be. Rome wasn’t built in one day. I still need to keep constantly working and to trust the process.”</p>
<p>In the Arizona Fall League just a few months ago, Dubon showcased his abilities in centerfield, as he started on occasion in the outfield. He is more than likely a shortstop going forward, but I asked him what the Brewers had planned for his development. “Whatever gets me up there, I’ll do it. I am a baseball player and I am not a one-position type of guy. If they want me to play the outfield, I will play the outfield.”</p>
<p>Character, work ethic, and a desire to succeed is what has made Dubon into the blossoming prospect he has become today. He left everything he ever knew when he was a 15-year-old freshman in high school to pursue his dream and passion. Time can only tell whether or not the Honduran-born infielder will don a Major League jersey one day, but it is a certain that Dubon will do everything in his power to see his dreams come to fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://milwaukee.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/02/16/mauricio-dubon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
