The Brewers allegedly signed free agent Yovani Gallardo over the weekend, with official announcement of the deal awaiting physical. Brewers fans either expressed joy at seeing the return of Gallardo, or expressed puzzlement at GM David Stearns’s move, with the historical cynics taking their chance to point out how Gallardo’s position among the franchise’s best starters represents the club’s futility. But, prior to the details emerging, even prior to an announced role, this is a good deal for one reason: Milwaukee is shoring up their dreadful low rotation in the hopes of maximizing their strengths of the pitching staff.
These Brewers are a pitching first club: Milwaukee’s success in 2017 almost entirely hinged on the pitching staff, which prevented 61 runs against the NL / Miller Park. This performance was good for fifth best in the NL. Despite the overall club strength, the Brewers limped along with a weak and shallow low rotation, which ultimately defined their failure to reach the playoffs as a stretch run depended on a series of ill-conceived Johnny Wholestaff days. Here’s how the pitching staff played out, highlighting the low rotation:
2017 Brewers | IP | Runs Prevented |
---|---|---|
Matt Garza | 114.7 | -13 |
Brandon Woodruff | 43.0 | -1 |
Paolo Espino | 17.7 | -4 |
Tommy Milone | 21.0 | -4 |
Junior Guerra | 70.3 | -8 |
Wily Peralta | 57.3 | -21 |
Low Rotation | 323.3 | -51 |
Other Starters | 600.0 | 62 |
All Other Pitchers | 522.3 | 50 |
Gallardo, for all of his warts as he ages into a low rotation role, immediately solidifies that group of pitchers. David Stearns need not rely on Tommy Milone, Paolo Espino, Wily Peralta types, and instead can ideally roll all of those starts into one pitcher. At best, Gallardo can serve as the club’s Matt Garza, who was pretty much just “run of the mill” low rotation bad, (hopefully) instead of requiring disastrous performances by the likes of Peralta. As a reminder, here is how the thin low rotation and Johnny Wholestaff days lost a chance at the playoffs, or potentially even the division for the Brewers:
Late Season Back-End | Date | IP | R | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|
Michael Blazek | 27-Jul | 2.3 | 8 | 2-15 Loss / 1.5 GB / 84 win pace |
Junior Guerra | 29-Jul | 3.0 | 0 | 1-2 Loss |
Brent Suter | 2-Aug | 5.3 | 5 | 4-5 Loss |
Matt Garza | 3-Aug | 5.7 | 1 | 2-1 Win |
Brandon Woodruff | 4-Aug | 6.3 | 0 | 2-0 Win |
Brent Suter | 7-Aug | 4.0 | 3 | 4-5 Loss |
Matt Garza | 8-Aug | 3.3 | 8 | 4-11 Loss |
Brandon Woodruff | 9-Aug | 5.7 | 2 | 0-4 Loss |
Brent Suter | 12-Aug | 5.0 | 5 | 6-5 Win |
Matt Garza | 13-Aug | 5.3 | 4 | 7-4 Win |
Matt Garza | 18-Aug | 4.3 | 8 | 4-8 Loss |
Brandon Woodruff | 19-Aug | 4.3 | 1 | 6-3 Win |
Matt Garza | 23-Aug | 5.0 | 1 | 2-4 Loss |
Matt Garza | 29-Aug | 3.3 | 6 | 2-10 Loss / 3.5 GB / 83 win pace |
Brandon Woodruff | 2-Sep | 7.0 | 1 | 2-3 Loss |
Brent Suter | 3-Sep | 3.0 | 0 | 7-2 Win |
Matt Garza | 6-Sep | 2.7 | 5 | 1-7 Loss |
Brandon Woodruff | 11-Sep | 5.0 | 6 | 0-7 Loss / 2.5 GB / 84 win pace |
Brent Suter | 12-Sep | 3.0 | 2 | 5-2 Win |
Jeremy Jeffress | 15-Sep | 2.0 | 2 | 10-2 Win |
Brandon Woodruff | 17-Sep | 7.0 | 3 | 10-3 Win |
Brent Suter | 18-Sep | 5.0 | 0 | 3-0 Win |
Aaron Wilkerson | 20-Sep | 2.3 | 3 | 4-6 Loss |
Brandon Woodruff | 22-Sep | 5.0 | 4 | 4-5 Loss |
Brent Suter | 23-Sep | 5.3 | 1 | 4-3 Win / 1.0 Game back of Wild Card / 85-86 win pace |
Brandon Woodruff | 27-Sep | 2.3 | 6 | 0-6 Loss |
Brent Suter | 28-Sep | 5.0 | 3 | 4-3 Win |
Junior Guerra | 30-Sep | 2.3 | 3 | 6-7 Loss / Eliminated from Playoff Eligibility |
120.3 | 91 | 12-16 / 6.81 runs average (-28 runs prevented) |
It is tempting to dig into Gallardo’s peripheral performance, and perhaps find a silver lining for the starter. If this is your path to thinking about the Gallardo deal, it is worth focusing on the veteran’s strike out rate, which is slowly climbing upward. Much has already been made on Twitter about the righty’s increased fastball velocity, but according to Brooks Baseball it’s the curve that fans should focus on. Gallardo continues to have aspects of his arsenal that generate whiffs, and perhaps as the Brewers transformed Jimmy Nelson into a big curveballer, Gallardo himself can move away from fastball / slider and toward fastball / curve to generate whiffs and groundballs.
Gallardo | IP | Runs Prevented | K% / BB% / GB% |
---|---|---|---|
2015 | 184.3 | 16 | 15.2 / 8.6 / 51.0 |
2016 | 118.0 | -15 | 16.2 / 11.6 / 44.0 |
2017 | 130.7 | -18 | 16.3 / 10.4 / 45.0 |
Note the runs prevented here, however: Gallardo is not terrible, for all the noise about his bad surface statistics. Plugging in 130 innings of -18 runs prevented ball can actually help the Brewers if it means wiping out 130 innings of Guerra / Peralta (-29 runs prevented) type baseball. In fact, if this exact scenario plays out, David Stearns just bought the Brewers a win, a win at the fringes of the roster no less.
There is a downside to the deal, and it would be disingenuous of me not to mention it, as I have consistently argued in favor of using the waiver pick-up, or low-risk pick up to gamble on building out the back-end rotation. This is certainly a necessary type of move for Milwaukee, but it’s worth investigating the high risk of those replacement type deals. Here, Stearns is gambling that he will not need to make several replacement transactions (think Milone / Espino / Wilkerson / Woodruff), and instead can lend the rotation some regularity every fifth day. Indeed, this could even help to rest up the bullpen and keep those elite innings churning on a typical schedule, too. Along with hunting for that one win at the back of the rotation, Stearns is also trying to buy transaction certainty, which can also be an important aspect of the club. At the worst, he’s probably replaced Matt Garza, and likely for a much lower price, while pushing any waiver type deals to much lower leverage within the rotation.
It would be audacious to call this a playoffs move after all that, and it’s certainly not the type of top rotation grab that Brewers fans wanted to headline the winter meetings. But, this move is a winning move. Now it’s time to bolster the other end of the rotation, in order to further strengthen the bullpen (especially by keeping LHP Josh Hader, LHP Brent Suter, and maybe even Guerra there) and truly push Gallardo to the back spot of the rotation.
Photo Credit: Andy Marlin, USAToday Sports Images
Is Gallardo an upgrade over Garza? Just looking at their ERA and ERA plus over the past two years, Garza is the better pitcher. Garza is even a tick better in runs prevented last year as well. Whatever they are going to Gallardo, they could have paid Garza the same amount. Garza was extremely unpopular with the fan base but in my mind he is a better pitcher than Gallardo which in the big picture isn’t really saying that much.
He is similar to Garza, except he is 3 years younger and will have the benefit of working with DJ for the first time. Yo definitely maintains the status quo in the 5th spot, with the possibility of an upgrade.